Featured Jobs
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
BPAS
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Pentegra
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Compass
|
|
DC Retirement Plan Administrator Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
66 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
National Law Review
May 17, 2017
"The Plan ... did not provide deference to the decisions of Plan Administrator. However ... the Court applied the abuse of discretion standard to examine the plan administrator's factual determinations.... [T]he Court noted that it is the only circuit that would apply deference to factual determinations made by a plan administrator when the plan does not vest them with that discretion, and also pointed to the growing number of state laws prohibiting discretionary clauses in insurance contracts." [Ariana M. v. Humana Health Plan of Texas, Inc., No. 16-20174 (5th Cir. Apr. 21, 2017)]
|
| 2. |
Report on Patient Privacy via AISHealth.com
July 2, 2007
Excerpt: Four years after the privacy rule went into effect, hospitals and other covered entities (CEs) are struggling with basic concepts that underlie compliance, such as what the 'minimum necessary' standard means. Mistrust among CEs is rampant, and many have implemented business practices in the name of privacy and security that have no basis in law.
|
| 3. |
REPORT ON PATIENT PRIVACY via AISHealth.com
May 10, 2007 Excerpt: In addition to misapplying minimum necessary to treatment, the study also documents pervasive confusion about how state laws dovetail with HIPAA, particularly in the area of substance abuse and mental health treatments, and overlapping and conflicting practices concerning patient consent policies and procedures. |
| 4. |
The Journal Record
June 30, 2025
"A 2023 ruling by the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals will stand after the nation's highest court denied certiorari in the legal dispute over Oklahoma's Patient's Right to Pharmacy Choice Act, which regulates pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs)." [PCMA v. Mulready, No. 22-6074 (10th Cir. Aug. 15, 2023; cert pet. denied Jun. 30, 2025, No. 23-1213)]
|
| 5. |
FOX 11 News - Los Angeles
Mar. 26, 2012
"Jamie Court sits down with the FOX 11 News team to discuss the ways in which California and the nation could be affected by the review of the constitutionality of the federal health care law by the Supreme Court."
|
| 6. |
McDermott Will & Emery in National Law Review
Nov. 6, 2018
"The First Circuit joined the Fourth, Fifth and Eighth Circuits holding that once a plaintiff demonstrates a fiduciary breach, the defendant has the burden to negate loss causation. Other circuits, including the Sixth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits, have held that a plaintiff bears to burden to establish loss causation. This issue is ripe for Supreme Court review." [Brotherston v. Putnam Investments, LLC, No. 17-1711 (1st Cir. Oct. 15, 2018)]
|
| 7. |
National Law Review
Dec. 9, 2019
"On December 4, 2019, the Solicitor General submitted his brief, which recommends that the Supreme Court accept the ... petition for certiorari, and recommends that the Court overturn the appeals court decision. At issue ... is whether an Arkansas statute that regulates the rates charged by Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), is preempted by [ERISA].... [T]he Arkansas law required PBMs to reimburse pharmacies for generic drugs at a price at least equal to what the pharmacy had paid for the drug." [Pharmaceutical Care Mgmt. Assoc. v. Rutledge, Nos. 17-1609 and 17-1629 (8th Cir. June 8, 2018; cert. pet. filed Oct. 22, 2018)]
|
| 8. |
Foley & Lardner LLP in National Law Review
June 3, 2019
"[M]any employers -- especially employers that currently offer 401(k) or pension plans to their employees -- may quickly dismiss these laws as not applicable. However, as employers add small employee groups, resulting from multistate expansion through organic growth or acquisitions, they should be aware of state-run retirement plan mandates to ensure compliance and avoid the accumulation of penalties."
|
| 9. |
National Law Review
Dec. 20, 2018
"Having settled many of its attacks on pension plans sponsored by several large church-affiliated healthcare organizations, the plaintiff's bar appears to be shifting focus ... One of the same firms that previously challenged the application of ERISA's 'church plan' exclusion several years ago represents the plaintiffs ... Notably, the 'church plan' cases have thus far been limited to pension plans. [This] case opens up a new front in the larger war being waged by the plaintiffs' law firm by challenging the status of Atrium's health plan as well."
|
| 10. |
Epstein Becker Green in National Law Review
Sept. 7, 2021
"This update describes key features of the IFR and IRS guidance ... [T]his article also discusses what contributing employers may wish to monitor in those affected plans and what they may need to consider in terms of their own business planning."
|
| Next » |
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|