Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
DC Retirement Plan Administrator Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
Strongpoint Partners
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Combo Retirement Plan Administrator Strongpoint Partners
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
Compass
|
|
MVP Plan Administrators, Inc.
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
3 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit via FindLaw
Aug. 4, 2003
Land v. CIGNA Healthcare of Florida, No. 02-15549 (11th Cir. Jul. 30, 2003). FindLaw.com excerpt: "Plaintiff"s state law medical malpractice claims against his employment-subscribed health maintenance organization, based upon a mixed decision of eligibility and treatment, are not preempted by ERISA.
|
| 2. |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit via FindLaw
July 28, 2003
Flint v. ABB, Inc., No. 02-15029 (11th Cir. Jul. 21, 2003). Excerpt: 3 Kemper reinstated Flint"s [disability] benefits and made the reinstatement retroactive to July 1, 2001.... Flint conceded that '[t]he Plan documents are silent regarding the payment of interest on Delayed Benefits'; nevertheless, he claimed that Section 502(a)(1)(B) and Section 502(a)(3)(B) of ERISA allow plaintiffs to recover accrued interest on reinstated benefits, even when an employer"s plan is silent on the issue.
|
| 3. |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit via FindLaw
Apr. 21, 2003
13 pages. Excerpt: Because employer's sickness/accident program is exempted by regulation from being considered a 'welfare benefits plan' under ERISA, this matter was improperly removed to federal court. [Stern v. IBM, No. 02-14740 (11th Cir. Apr. 14, 2003)]
|
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|