Featured Jobs
|
DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
|
|
The Pension Source
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Retirement Combo Plan Administrator Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
|
|
Defined Benefit Specialist II or III Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Merkley Retirement Consultants
|
|
Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
|
July Business Services
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
40 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Dec. 22, 2023
"Although generally excluded from Form W-2 reporting, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code requires that separate information returns be furnished to most U.S. taxpayers who exercised ISOs during 2023 (an 'optionee') or who transferred shares during 2023 that were acquired under an ESPP (a 'transferor').... The deadline for furnishing Forms 3921 and 3922 to optionees and transferors is January 31, 2024. The deadline for filing Forms 3921 and 3922 with the IRS is February 28, 2024,"
|
| 2. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Oct. 31, 2022
"[In] the reopening releases, the SEC stated that including only 'Big R' restatements could lead companies to make questionable materiality judgments in order to avoid recoupment of incentive compensation. By including the more commonplace 'little r' restatements in the final rules, the SEC broadened the scope of the rules considerably."
|
| 3. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Sept. 19, 2019
"Pointing to an increasing trend of private equity firms acquiring physician staffing companies and private emergency transportation companies contracting with hospitals, a key congressional committee announced a bipartisan investigation this week into the practices of private equity firms related to surprise billing."
|
| 4. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Aug. 25, 2019
"The full impact of the proposed plan on all stakeholders has not been fully evaluated.... For PBMs, would the existence of pathways #1 and #2 alter how the PBMs negotiate formulary drugs with pharmaceutical manufacturers? Could the PBMs' push for manufacturers to use pathway #2 at some time in the future point to remaining on formulary drugs? Would importing drugs create shortages in foreign countries, potentially impacting U.S. diplomacy with them?"
|
| 5. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
May 30, 2019
"Under the expanded program, self-correction can be used to correct operational failures by adopting retroactive plan amendments to conform the plan terms to the plan operations if: [1] the amendment would result in an increase of a benefit, right, or feature; [2] the increase is provided to all eligible employees under the plan; and [3] the increase is permitted under the code and satisfies the general correction principles of EPCRS."
|
| 6. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Mar. 12, 2019
"The proposed rule ... adds a new safe harbor for point-of-sale price reductions ... [which] requires that the following criteria be met: [1] The reduced price must be set in advance with a plan sponsor under Medicare Part D, a Medicaid MCO, or the PBM acting under contract with either; [2] the sale does not involve a rebate unless the full value of the reduction in price is provided to the dispensing pharmacy through a chargeback or series of chargebacks, or is required by law; and [3] the reduction in price must be completely applied to the price of the prescription drug charged to the beneficiary at the point of sale."
|
| 7. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Aug. 30, 2018
"Stock option awards that vest based on continued service granted before the grandfathered date that otherwise qualified as performance-based compensation under the pre-act Section 162(m) rules typically will continue to be treated as performance-based compensation ... Many performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted before the grandfathered date that otherwise qualified as performance-based compensation under the pre-act Section 162(m) rules will not be grandfathered ... Many bonus plans in effect as of the grandfathered date under which the payments would have qualified as performance-based compensation pursuant to the pre-act Section 162(m) rules also will not be grandfathered[.]"
|
| 8. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
July 31, 2018
"The Regulations required related entities to share the costs of employee stock-based compensation in order for their cost-sharing arrangements to be classified as qualified cost-sharing arrangements under Section 4824 and the relevant Treasury Regulations.... [T]he Ninth Circuit first determined that Treasury had complied with the APA in promulgating the Regulations ... [and] then applied the two-part Chevron analysis to hold that the Regulations were a permissible interpretation of Section 482." [Altera Corp. v. Comm'r, Nos. 16-70496, 16-70497 (9th Cir. July 24, 2018)]
|
| 9. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Nov. 19, 2017
"[B]oth the House and Senate proposals leave the current law regarding the taxation of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) largely intact, stepping away from the initial proposals to tax such awards at vesting.... The proposed amendments would eliminate a publicly traded company's ability to deduct compensation above $1 million that it pays in any year to any covered employees... [W]ith the proposed 20 percent corporate tax rate, the lost tax deduction will be smaller than under current law."
|
| 10. |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Sept. 13, 2016
"Whether or not the SEC's asserted positions would ultimately prevail in court, in light of these settlements and the SEC's apparent enforcement position, employers should consider reviewing their policies, codes of conduct, and employee agreements to ensure that that they do not include provisions that the SEC may assert deter employees from coming forward with information about potential securities law violations. Even those companies not subject to the SEC's jurisdiction may wish to undertake such measures, as the SEC's stance is similar to that now taken by the [NLRB] and the [EEOC][.]"
|
| Next » |
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|