Featured Jobs
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Retirement Plan Onboarding Specialist Compass
|
|
Relationship Manager - Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
PPS Pension Services
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Sixth Circuit: Golden Parachute Payments Not Illegal Merely Just Because They're Excessive and Grossed Up for Taxes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit via FindLaw
[Opinion] Feb. 5, 2001 Campbell v. Potash Corp. (6th Cir. February 02, 2001). Excerpt: [Appellant] next argues that the golden parachutes violate public policy, and therefore that the assumption agreement promising them is void.... [Appellant] cites no circuit case law supporting its proposition. At most this court has frowned on golden parachutes in past dicta, but we have never held that such severance packages are per se unlawful. MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |