Featured Jobs
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Retirement Plan Onboarding Specialist Compass
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
PPS Pension Services
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Relationship Manager - Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Text of Law Firm's Comments on IRS Notice 2007-62 (PDF)
Polsinelli Shalton Flanigan Suelthaus PC
Oct. 31, 2007 6 pages. The commenting law firm recommends that Treasury and the IRS reconsider whether the definition of 'substantial risk of forfeiture' described in the final regulations under Section 409A is appropriate for purposes of Section 457(f). Specifically, employees of governmental and tax-exempt organizations should not be prohibited from making elective deferrals of compensation, so long as the employee's rights to the amounts deferred are conditioned on either (i) the performance of substantial future services, or (ii) the occurrence of a condition related to a purpose of the compensation. MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |