Featured Jobs
|
PPS Pension Services
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Relationship Manager - Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Frank Pension Consultants, Ltd.
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Retirement Plan Onboarding Specialist Compass
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Text of Opinion: Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. et al. v. Glenn (PDF)
Supreme Court of the United States
[Official Guidance] June 23, 2008 34 pages. Excerpt: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) permits a person denied benefits under an employee benefit plan to challenge that denial in federal court. 88 Stat. 829, as amended, 29 U.S. C. §1001 et seq.; see §1132(a)(1)(B). Often the entity that administers the plan, such as an employer or an insurance company, both determines whether an employee is eligible for benefits and pays benefits out of its own pocket. We here decide that this dual role creates a conflict of interest; that a reviewing court should consider that conflict as a factor in determining whether the plan administrator has abused its discretion in denying benefits; and that the significance of the factor will depend upon the circumstances of the particular case. MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |