Featured Jobs
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Retirement Plan Onboarding Specialist Compass
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
PPS Pension Services
|
|
Relationship Manager - Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds State's 'Imputed Service' Formula for Disability Pensions
Deloitte via BenefitsLink 
[Guidance Overview] July 3, 2008
Excerpt: The lynchpin of the Supreme Court's decision was its interpretation of Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604 (1993), which involved a 62-year old employee who claimed he was unlawfully discharged by the employer in order to avoid the payment of pension benefits that were about to vest. In Hazen, the Supreme Court found that, without evidence of intent, a dismissal based on pension status was not a dismissal because of age.
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |