Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/21/2013 in all forums

  1. Prime rate may be for banks "best customers" only, and indeed "very rare". But what does a bank charge for a loan FULLY SECURED by the balance of a savings account held at that bank? This is akin to what a plan loan is like, the plan has NO RISK, just like the bank making a passbook secured loan has no risk. Prime+2 seems high.
    1 point
  2. Like MoJo said, isn't operating the plan in a tax-qualified way in the "best interests of the participants"?
    1 point
  3. masteff's observation is apt for many reasons. Among them is respecting the participant's privacy. It's at least possible that a participant might not have wanted anyone other than the beneficiary to know whom she named as her beneficiary. Or if she did want others to know, it was for her to choose to whom and what she would reveal.
    1 point
  4. An example of why it should be avoided for anyone who is not the listed beneficiary to know who was listed as a beneficiary. Now you're caught in the middle of a squabble.
    1 point
  5. Unless the participant got married, or unless you can prove some malfeasance, I don't know of anything that would cause such a change.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use