Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/28/2016 in all forums

  1. For those of us who are less immediately knowledgeable than Ubernerd, My 2 cents, David Rigby, and Mike Preston, it would be nice if the IRS published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin the next year's table (even if nothing but its caption changed) with a one-paragraph introduction about why it didn't change.
    2 points
  2. It was nice of them to put this all down in one place. Great example of how regulations can destroy something that's supposed to be a nice benefit. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/irs_reporting_disclosure_guide.pdf
    1 point
  3. I don't believe you can file an EZ for 2015 as the Plan had a non-owner participant at some point in 2015.
    1 point
  4. A non-spouse beneficiary can elect a rollover, but only to an inherited IRA. So, it must be rollover eligible, and therefore, subject to 20% withholding if taken in cash. Don't have cites handy.
    1 point
  5. If the plan's administrator has not decided that the participant is dead and no one has submitted a claim for a death benefit, the administrator might consider that it has no current need to discern who might be a beneficiary. Consider that reaching-out efforts often spark false claims. If the participant's employment ended in 2014 (and the balance is low enough to call for an involuntary distribution), shouldn't a routine processing of involuntary distributions have emptied the account before 2016? The plan's administrator should use or engage identity-control, death-information, and address-information services that are under the administrator's control, without communication to a person who seems to be the participant's relative.
    1 point
  6. If the test is passing at just gateway, lowering comp will lower allocation. 5% of $25,000 is less than 5% of $50k. [Thanks, Captain Obvious!]
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use