Jump to content

    QEBA and Division of Property Orders (DPOs)

    Guest TAXMANAGER
    By Guest TAXMANAGER,

    Can anyone answer this question:

    It is my understanding that when an alternate payee (ex-spouse) is receiving a portion of the member's benefit, the 415(B) limit is based on the full amount. Is this correct or should the 415 (B) limit be based solely on the portion that the member is receiving? The alternate payees portion of the benefit is not included in the members gross/taxable benefit on the 1099 unlike child support orders in which the taxability is the members responsibility.

    If the full benefit is used, can alternate payees receive QEBA payments? If so, when does one apply the QEBA to the alternate payee and what method should be used to determine the portion that is applied? Or do I need to apply the QEBA solely to the members portion of the benefit and leave the alternate payees portion alone?


    403b

    Guest l.skin
    By Guest l.skin,

    Hello

    I am wondering if someone can help me with the correct way to calculate the 15 year of servioe catch up.

    Here is what I am wondering. At one time there was a glitch the IRS created and all prior Roth contributions to a 403 with the employer reduced the $15,000 catch up dollar for dollar. I have heard that is no longer true and that now it it just the Roth contributions as well as the pretax contributions that exceed the 402g limits in past years that would reduce the $15,000 dollar for dollar. If this is correct can someone let me know where to locate the communication that this was corrected?

    Also it appears any employer retirement plan cash deferral applies to this calculation as well. Meaning when you look at the overall contributions to see if they have averaged over $5000 a year in contributions that you look at all plans with the employer which could include SIMPLE IRAs, SARSEPs and 401k plans but not 457 plans. Again if this is the case what could I use as a reference that this is true?

    Thanks for your help on this


    QEBA and Division of Property Orders (DPOs)

    Guest TAXMANAGER
    By Guest TAXMANAGER,

    Can anyone answer this question:

    It is my understanding that when an alternate payee (ex-spouse) is receiving a portion of the member's benefit, the 415(B) limit is based on the full amount. Is this correct or should the 415 (B) limit be based solely on the portion that the member is receiving? The alternate payee’s portion of the benefit is not included in the member’s gross/taxable benefit on the 1099 unlike child support orders in which the taxability is the member’s responsibility.

    If the full benefit is used, can alternate payees receive QEBA payments? If so, when does one apply the QEBA to the alternate payee and what method should be used to determine the portion that is applied? Or do I need to apply the QEBA solely to the member’s portion of the benefit and leave the alternate payee’s portion alone?


    Failed 401(a)(26)

    John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA
    By John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA,

    6 nonexcludables for the plan year: calendar year 2008. Two have large benefit accruals exceeding 0.50% of pay. The other employees whose accruals also would have exceeded 0.50% of pay? Well, they all quit before their 1,000 hours for calendar year 2008.

    One NHCE has an accrual of 0.41% of pay. Can the plan be amended to increase an accrual for the NHCE (or all) under -11(g), or is 401(a)(26) outside the scope of a -11(g) amendment?

    edit:typo


    Bridging Early Retirees- Plan Amendment Needed?

    Guest Gumby
    By Guest Gumby,

    We're considering offering an early retirement program whereby employees' age + service would be bridged for purposes of qualifying them for retiree medical (currently Rule of 70). Does management's decision to attribute additional age + service to an employee technically require a plan amendment in order to be recognized under the plan or can its decision to deem early retirees an additional number of years of age + service to get them to the vesting threshold be viewed as an administrative decision?


    Going Paperless

    waid10
    By waid10,

    Hi. We will be scanning and electronically storing HR related documents as well as working towards on-line new hire enrollment and on-line status changes. Can someone point me to guidance on what are the issues we need to consider as we go through this process? What documents should be maintained with original signatures? As we attempt to go paperless, how long should we hold on to old enrollment forms? Other questions/issues I haven't thought of yet?

    Thanks.


    Going Paperless

    waid10
    By waid10,

    Hi. We will be scanning and electronically storing HR related documents as well as working towards on-line new hire enrollment and on-line status changes. Can someone point me to guidance on what are the issues we need to consider as we go through this process? What documents should be maintained with original signatures? As we attempt to go paperless, how long should we hold on to old enrollment forms? Other questions/issues I haven't thought of yet?

    Thanks.


    412(i) plan - reduce formula

    jkdoll2
    By jkdoll2,

    How do you reduce the formula in a 412(e) plan? The premiums for the insurance are the same each year - it is just the annuity that changes. If you reduce the formula the death benefit also gets reduced, doesn't it. Do you have to reduce the insurance policies death benefit? Do you do a fresh start like a typical DB plan if you reduce the formula?

    The company has hit hard times - and instead of terminating the plan - they just want a smaller contribution.

    Thanks


    SSA Information

    Guest furiousfurrball
    By Guest furiousfurrball,

    How do you report balance information for the SSA - do you report it as the employee's termination date or the last day of the plan year?


    Reemployment after Retirement

    Guest ERISAQuestioner
    By Guest ERISAQuestioner,

    Does anybody know the IRC Section, the reg., the ruling, or letter, that makes this requirement:

    "Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidelines prohibit distributions from a qualified pension plan to participants who are actively employed in either a full-time or part-time position with an employer covered by the plan. This prohibition extends to participants under the age of 59 ½ years who are re-employed after retirement without a bona fide break in service. The IRS may impose a 10% penalty on your retirement benefit if you violate the prohibition.

    Consequently, you must be removed from the County payroll for at least 30 days before being reemployed by the County. Also, your decision to retire must not be conditioned upon an offer of re-employment."

    This requirement is in every plan but I can't find the source which requires it. Anybody know offhand or have any suggestions? And, may employees over the age of 59 1/2 be reemployed without any break in service--any prohibition on that?


    Is an audit required?

    emmetttrudy
    By emmetttrudy,

    New DB Plan as of 1/1/2008. Participant count is 114. So with my understanding of the 80/120 rule they do NOT need an audit and can file a Sch. I instead of a Sch. H. However, they do have a 401(k) Plan which is subject to an audit (over 120 participants). Is there a rule that says if one employer's Plan is subject to audit then all of the Employer's plans are subject to audit as well? And if so, can you reference a code section? Thanks!


    3% Safe Harbor

    Jay3
    By Jay3,

    Does a plan operating as a safe harbor (3% non-elective) lose its' safe harbor status if it also provides a match formula of 40% match on deferrals up to 10% compensation.


    Pros and Cons of DOL's Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program (VFCP)

    401 Chaos
    By 401 Chaos,

    I know there have been some prior posts about this including reference to an old article (say around 2000 or 2001) entitled Pros and Cons of the the VFCP. I was wondering if anybody could correct me to a more recent article or checklist that one might use as a decision tool here. Have a 401(k) plan that failed to timely submit all 401(k) deferrals at the same time due to record transfer error. The failure resulted in a small amount of deferrals ($5,000) being a few days late last fall during which time general market incurred significant loss. Accordingly, we would expect loss, if any, to participants as a result to be very small. Willing to make up lost interest amounts, etc. but is it really worth going through VFCP filing?


    hsa non-discrimination tests

    Guest JoshmkII
    By Guest JoshmkII,

    Hi there, I tried to search but couldnt come up with anything (that I thought) that could help.

    I pretty much need a worksheet kind of thing to work out just how a company can give their key emps more inan hsa than other emps.

    thanks


    Adding Roth - new EIN necessary?

    Gudgergirl
    By Gudgergirl,

    Does anyone know if a Plan must obtain a new (presumably additional) EIN when it adds Roth deferrals?


    Deceased participant's account

    Gudgergirl
    By Gudgergirl,

    Plan recently terminated and paid out all participants save one. The lone holdout is actually a participant who died several years ago. There is no beneficiary designation and the participant's estate was not probated. The Plan sponsor has tried to find heirs to the participant with no luck. The participant's account is in the range of $400. What can the Plan Sponsor do?


    Stop Loss Schedule A

    Guest furiousfurrball
    By Guest furiousfurrball,

    We have a self insured medical plan. We have a schedule A for the stop loss, do we file this with the 5500? The stop loss is between the carrier and the insurer not the plan.


    NDT

    Guest furiousfurrball
    By Guest furiousfurrball,

    Does a 403(b) plan run by a non profit have to comply with Non Discrimination Tests? I assume in the past no, but for 2009 with the new regs will it change? TIA


    Eliminating loans from a plan

    tymesup
    By tymesup,

    Can new loans be eliminated from a plan, prospectively? If so, is a 204(h) Notice required ahead of time? What would you do about existing loans?

    Thanks in advance for any help.


    DB Plan With Life Insurance

    Dougsbpc
    By Dougsbpc,

    We inherited a DB plan with Life Insurance. This plan is sponsored by a small corporation with 10 participants.

    The Death Benefit under the plan is the greater of Insurance proceeds less cash value or the present value of accrued benefits.

    The document indicates the face amount of policies shall be 100 times the anticipated monthly benefit. With an on-going plan the face amount for each participant is their projected monthly benefit X 100. Does anything change if the plan is frozen? In this case there were 2 new entrants in 2008 who accrued benefits. The plan was then frozen 1/1/2009. Must policies be based on their projected benefits even though the plan is frozen?

    The goal here is to make sure all participants have the proper amount of insurance.

    Speaking of the proper amount of insurance, the 100% owner of the corp (and only key employee) only has insurance of about 50 times his monthly benefit. Could he waive (in writing) the remaining amount that the plan would ordinarily purchase for him?


Portal by DevFuse · Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use