Jump to content

    Deemed Distribution - Good test question for the pension geeks!

    Brenda Wren
    By Brenda Wren,

    Participant has 4 loans outstanding; all were taken for 5-year terms.  Vested account balance exceeds $100,000.  Current loan balance, rate and maturity date:  $8500 at 8% matures 4/30/28, $4000 at 8% matures 9/30/28, $4700 at 8% matures 5/15/28 and $20,000 at 6.75% matures 4/30/31.  Loans are consolidated at current rate of 6.75%, new balance of $37,200 with a new maturity date of 6/30/31.  Does this loan consolidation exceed the loan limits and if so, what is the amount of the deemed distribution?


    Regional Sales Representative

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Ameritas (Remote / TN)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Retirement Plan Documents Specialist

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Loren D. Stark Company (Remote / Houston TX)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Sales Development Representative

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Ubiquity Retirement + Savings (NJ / NY / Hybrid)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    SH 3% – Can We Exclude a W-2 Contractor Mid-Year?

    kimso
    By kimso,

    SH 3% plan. No excluded classes of EEs.  Company is a med practice and I just found out that they have contractors ("Associates") that are paid via W-2. There is one Associate who has met initial eligibility and has been given the Safe Harbor contribution, and for whatever reason, doesn't want to be a part of the plan, including the Safe Harbor contributions. EE is not deferring. What are some of the options? Client doesn't think EE will want to switch to 1099. Client is OK with amending document to add an exclusion, but would this be able to stop the current EE from receiving any future contributions? It is only 1 EE who will be HCE for 2026. If so, would this amendment be allowed, say 8/1?


    HCE requests full distribution but plan always fails ADP

    Lou81
    By Lou81,

    I am wondering how to handle this situation.

    HCE retires and is requesting a rollover of 100% of his account balance.

    The document states that distributions are paid out: immediately

    The plan fails the ADP test every year and he is due a refund.

    Should the plan pay out all of his account, except for current year contributions?  or do we hold until after the APD test is completed next year?

    Thank you!

     


    minimal underpmt of 401(k), but participant already termed & distributed

    TPApril
    By TPApril,

    Upon review, it was determined a participant's 401(k) that was withheld from his paycheck in the amount of $35 was not deposited. Participant has since terminated over a year ago and took a full distribution. Recordkeeper refuses to reopen the account without new enrollment paperwork.

    Thinking to have the amount deposited to the Forfeiture account and be done with it.

    By the way, in terms of delinquent contributions, this is the only amount.


    Retirement Plan Consultant - DC

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for EGPS (a Blue Ridge Company) (Remote / Baxter MN)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Late Contribution Correction Question

    khn
    By khn,

    If a few payrolls from 2024 have been identified as late, is it correct that we only report the late ee deferrals on the 5500, but calculate earnings on both the late ee and er deferrals when processing the correction to make participants whole?


    Financial Analyst

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA] (CA / DC / MD / PA / Hybrid)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Sr Plan Compliance Specialist

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for American Trust Retirement (Remote / Lexington KY)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Sr Plan Document Compliance Specialist

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for American Trust Retirement (Remote / Lexington KY)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Correcting Excess Investment Advisor Fees Charged to Participant Accounts

    Footnote12
    By Footnote12,

    A 401(k) plan recently changed investment advisors, resulting in lower investment advisory fees. However, due to an administrative error, the plan's recordkeeper continued deducting the prior (higher) investment advisory fee from participant accounts for approximately three months after the transition. The recordkeeper has indicated that it was unaware of the fee change when processing the deductions.

    What is the appropriate method for correcting this error? Specifically, should the recordkeeper (or another party) restore the excess fees to affected participant accounts, and are there any ERISA or other compliance considerations that should be taken into account when making the correction?


    Installation Coordinator

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Pinnacle Plan Design (Remote / Tucson AZ)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Sr. Plan Consultant

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for BPAS (Remote / Hybrid)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Distribution-Loan Specialist

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Daybright Financial (Remote)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Product Counsel, ERISA & Operations

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Human Interest [testing] [testing] (Remote)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Product Counsel, ERISA & Operations

    BenefitsLink
    By BenefitsLink,
    for Human Interest (Remote)

    View the full text of this job opportunity


    Floor offset DB plan subject to PBGC coverage?

    Micks
    By Micks,

    We’ve recommended that the Plan Administrator obtain guidance from an ERISA attorney, but I’m interested in how others would view this situation.

    The TPA designed the floor offset defined benefit plan and prepares the Form 5500. The 2024 plan year is the first year the plan met the audit requirement threshold.

    Per the Form 5500 filings, the TPA has consistently indicated that PBGC premiums are not required (i.e., “No” to PBGC coverage) since plan inception.

    However, based on our understanding of the Plan sponsor, it does not appear to fall within a typical PBGC exemption category (e.g., not a governmental plan, church plan, small professional service employer, or owner-only plan).

    Given that private-sector DB plans are generally covered by PBGC unless an exemption applies, the lack of PBGC premiums raises a question as to whether the plan has been appropriately classified.  In addition, if the plan should have been subject to PBGC coverage, this would introduce additional compliance concerns, including the apparent failure to issue required Notices of Intent to Terminate (NOITs).

    In your experience, have you seen situations where a floor offset DB plan would legitimately not be subject to PBGC coverage under these facts? Or would this typically warrant further review (e.g., potential missed premiums or misclassification)?  

    Health Plan Procurement Methods

    PhilB
    By PhilB,

    Hello all!

    I'm interested in hearing about how employers have contracted with health plans; do you use a Request for Proposals (RFP) procurement process or some other form of procurement, e.g., Request for Bids (RFB) or Invitation to Negotiate?

    I'm also interested in the pros and cons related to different procurement mechanisms you've used, what has proved most successful, what hasn't and why or other lessons learned.

    I would appreciate any information you can share about your health plan procurement process!


Portal by DevFuse · Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS
×
×
  • Create New...