- 2 replies
- 1,869 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,397 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,350 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,643 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 2,252 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,132 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,353 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,327 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,992 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,147 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,466 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,119 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,837 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,617 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,294 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 3,776 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,828 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,385 views
- Add Reply
- 18 replies
- 3,374 views
- Add Reply
Can "members" of an LLC particpate in a 125 Plan
Can "members" of an LLC participate in a 125 Plan? I'm told (in the present case) that although the LLC in question has elected to be taxed as a partnership, the members receive W-2s. In my mind, if the members receive W-2s, then they're employees and should be able to participate. Can someone set me straight? Thanks.
Unsolicited Spam Mail From Pension One Source
I received an unsolicited Advertisement from this Firm. They used the BenefitsLink White Pages to do this mass mailing, so many of you also received it. Do you think this should be allowed on BenefitsLink?
[This message has been edited by LCARUSI (edited 03-10-2000).]
I need a Primer on taxation of defaulted loans.
How is defaulted loan taxed. My understanding has been that upon default of loan, the full value of outstanding principal and unpaid interest on default date is deemed distribution and taxable in year of default. Is this correct? After deemed distribution, what happens to additional accrued interest?
post 65 accruals
I have seen several places that a suspension of benefits notice is required for a plan that allows participants to continue to accrue benefits after normal retirement age. In my case, the employer continues to credit for years of service but does not actuarially increase the benefit.
The only reference I can find to this type of notice is Labor Reg 2530.203-3(B)(4). However, the regulation concerns suspension of benefits upon re-employment. Does this also apply to the employee who remains employed but does not take a benefit?
If yes, is there a model notice or any further guidance out there from the DOL or the IRS?
Frozen Plan and new participants
Just taken over a defined benefit pension plan that has had benefits frozen by amendment at the end of 1995. Plan was top heavy through end of 1996, and is no longer top heavy. Company is active and is just running this plan for another few years to bring funding up to an acceptable level at which point plan will terminate.
My question is about participants who have entered in 1998 forward. They have no accrued benefit and will not have any further accrued benefit as sponsor has no intention of lifting accruals. I'm assuming I can amend the plan to eliminate future entrants in 2000; any way that I can eliminate the $0 benefit participants? Thought about changing definition of eligible employee to eliminate those with no accrued benefit under the plan. Would a now excluded employee with $0 accrued benefit be able to be dropped as participant (ala a deemed distribution to a terminated non-vested participant) for PBGC premium and IRS count purposes? (Count is getting close to 100 and would like to avoid additional complexity with over 100 count).
Thanks for any input on this issue.
Required Notices at time of Distribution
My company provides a 402(f) notice nearly identical to the model in IRS Notice 2000-11 to each participant in advance of distribution. We also provide a brochure summarizing Federal tax consequences and identifying the timing for receipt of form 1099R. Most of this brochure duplicates
information in the 402(f) notice, except some additional detail on capital gains, ten-year averaging and description of specific timing of when our company provides From 1099R. My co-worker calls this a 6057 notice and says we must provide it. I checked Section 6057 and didn't see much resemblance to this brochure. Can anyone point me towards a reference describing the required contents of a 6057 notice? Is my co-worker crazy? Also, we provide an explanation of the QJSA waiver and spousal consent. Are any other notices required at the time of distribution? Thanks for your time.
Required Notices for Benefit Distribution
My company provides a 402(f) notice nearly identical to the model in IRS Notice 2000-11 to each participant in advance of distribution. We also provide a brochure summarizing Federal tax consequences and identifying the timing for receipt of form 1099R. Most of this brochure duplicates
information in the 402(f) notice, except some additional detail on capital gains, ten-year averaging and description of specific timing of when our company provides From 1099R. My co-worker calls this a 6057 notice and says we must provide it. I checked Section 6057 and didn't see much resemblance to this brochure. Can anyone point me towards a reference describing the required contents of a 6057 notice? Is my co-worker crazy? Also, we provide an explanation of the QJSA waiver and spousal consent. Are any other notices required at the time of distribution? Thanks for your time.
IRA COnversion to Roth
hi.. I had a traditional IRA account. there was $5800 in it this amount consisted of a 1997 $2000 deposit and a 1998 $2000 deposit both of these deposits were nondeductible. $1800 is the interest. In 1999 i converted the $5800 to a roth IRA. What amount do I have to pay taxes on ?? the 1099-r states 0 as the taxable amount.
please help... thanks a lot.
Correction or corrective distributions of excess aggregate contributio
What is the proper procedure for making corrective distributions due to ACP test failure when match contribution has not yet been deposited? An employer has decided to make a discretionary matching contribution, and the match formula is defined in the plan document. The employer is planning on depositing the matching contribution after March 15. The ACP test fails and will be corrected through corrective distributions of the excess aggregate contributions. The employer would like to refund the excess aggregate contributions (match) before March 15. A few questions: 1) Can we safely assume that no earnings will be involved since the match has not yet been deposited? 2) Is it possible to make the actual deposit of match net out the excess aggregate contribution amount, so that the excess aggregate contribution amount is never deposited? 3) Can the employer refund the excess aggregate contributions from current match account balances before March 15, even though the match involved in the calculation has not yet been deposited?
Are forfeitures released and are earnings calculated when matching con
What is the proper procedure for handling forfeitures when match contribution has not yet been deposited? An employer has decided to make a discretionary matching contribution, and the match formula is defined in the plan document. The employer is planning on depositing the matching contribution after March 15. The ADP test fails and will be corrected before April 15 through corrective distributions of deferrals. The matching contributions associated with the excess contributions (deferrals returned due to the ADP test failure) will be treated as forfeitures and the plan document provides for reallocating them to other plan participants. The employer will make the corrective distributions of excess contributions before March 15, but the match will not be deposited until later. Questions: 1) Can we safely assume that no earnings will be calculated on the match treated as forfeiture? 2) Can the employer release forfeiture amounts attributable to the discretionary match from current match account balances, even though the match involved in the calculation has not yet been deposited?
Clarification of restrictions on key employees
Client has 125 plan for medical and dependent care expenses and medical insurance premiums. All contributions are funded by the participant.
What are the limitations on key employees? If the key employees' deferrals exceed 25% of total deferrals, what happens??
Please excuse my ignorance. I have very limited knowledge in this area.
Thanks for any help!
Wraparound SPD
We are contemplating using a wraparound SPD for a welfare program, under which various duplicate provisions are placed in one tabbed section (e.g., COBRA rights, ERISA statement, claims procedures).
However, we are not sure if it is worth the cost and time associated with creating these sections, where the individual plan docs have been amended and are ready to go.
Obviously, wraparounds are a good idea in the long run, but is it worth is for smaller employers (I typically see them with Fortune 500 companies and large multiemployer plans).
Any thoughts?
------------------
Failure to make discretionary profit sharing contribution for non HCE'
A client with a discretionary profit sharing plan failed to make the full contribution for non-HCE's on time. What are the consequences of this other than corporate tax issues? What if anything other than making the contribution must be done?
Different treatment of highly and nonhighly compensated employees
A 401(k) plan limits participant contributions to 15% of eligible compensation. What issues arise if increase this limit for nonhighly compensated employees only? Employer matches $.50 on the dollar up to the first 6% of pay.
404(a)(7) Limitation - DB/DC Plans
Our company has a 401(k) Plan and a defined benefit plan which includes a 401(h) Plan.
Should the 401(h)Plan contributions be included when we test for the 404(a)(7) limitation?
I have gotten both "Yes" and "No" answers. I would appreciate any specific citations that support your answer.
Thank you,
Mike Muller
Lump sum distribution to a deferred vested participant
I think It all comes back to your Plan Document. I see nothing wrong with your approach, but I don't think it's something that you, as the actuary, can choose to do based on personal preference.
Most documents describe the lump sum as the value of the Accrued Benefit payable at Normal Retirement Date, but I have seen some that determine it based on the value of the benefit at the earliest possible commencement date.
I think you need to be careful not to let your "pet peeves" cause your clients to incure liabilities beyond what the Plan Document allows.
If they find your doing something beyond what the document requires, they will most likely come after you for restoration of the assets.
Need advice on whether to return to work full-time
Employee Education - Income Taxation
I am looking for citations relating to the income taxation of employer provided investment education. How much investment education can an employer provide before it becomes a taxable benefit to employees? Is there a non-discrimination requirement?
Thanks, JD Colville
Tax Notice at time of distribution from 401(k)?
My company provides a 402(f) notice nearly identical to the model in IRS Notice 2000-11 to each participant in advance of distribution. We also provide a brochure summarizing Federal tax consequences and identifying the timing for receipt of form 1099R. Most of this brochure duplicates information in the 402(f) notice, except some additional detail on capital gains, ten-year averaging and description of specific timing of when our company provides From 1099R. My co-worker calls this a 6057 notice and says we must provide it. I checked Section 6057 and didn't see much resemblance to this brochure. Can anyone point me towards a reference describing the required contents of a 6057 notice? Is my co-worker crazy? Also, we provide an explanation of the QJSA waiver and spousal consent. Are any other notices required at the time of distribution? Thanks for your time.
Can participants be charged a distribution fee upon leaving the plan?
Has the question ever been resolved whether or not participants can be charged a distribution fee upon leaving the plan. there seems to be mixed opinions on this. some people contend that the DOL prohibits this cost being charged to participants and that it should be spread evenly among all participants. others say that the participant can be charged.








