msmith
Registered-
Posts
209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by msmith
-
checking match that's funded by payroll
msmith replied to Rayofsunshine's topic in Relius Administration
I agree with @ratherbereading. If it is payroll period basis, I only look to make sure the amount has not violated the annual compensation limit. Other, we disclose that we are not responsible for the payroll period Match calculation. -
Oh my Lord can someone please call Congress and tell them to stop???
msmith replied to austin3515's topic in 401(k) Plans
You would think that Congress has more pressing issues to deal with than this type of legislation. -
Client just forwarded IRS letter, for Calendar Year 2022 plan, that was filed in May 2023 (before July 31 due date). The letter stated that the Extension was denied due to an untimely filing.
-
We have had several this year, for the 12/31/2022 Plan Year.
-
Dental practice sold - final employer contributions
msmith replied to pmacduff's topic in Plan Terminations
Earlier this year, I had the same situation and deposited the Profit Sharing after the Asset Sale date. Buyer did not object. -
Another Ineligible 401(k) Contribution Question
msmith replied to 401kAllTheWay's topic in 401(k) Plans
Payroll error seems more like an amended W-2 and not a 1099-R issue. -
I agree 100% with Paul I. Not willing to risk my credentials for outright fraud. Ethics is a big factor in how this is reconciled.
-
Is it feasible for a Plan Sponsor to opt out of Roth Deferrals (and Catch-ups altogether) and advise participants to seek advice on establishing a Roth IRA?
-
FIS/Relius IDP VS document users and adding Roth for 2024
msmith replied to Rayofsunshine's topic in Plan Document Amendments
We not longer use the FIS VS - but when we did, I had a conversion with one of their Legal Staff. Best to restate to add Roth, as Roth impact language throughout the document. As with all document providers, there is no amendment yet for SECURE 2.0 - at least, not that I am aware of any. Adding Roth would be a discretionary Amendment. Why not wait until later in 2023 and maybe, we will have SECURE 2.0 language - as a tack on Amendment. -
For the CCYLE 3 Restatements, we went from FIS/Relius Volume Submitter to ASC (non-standardized Adoption Agreement). While the Relius document had default language that a "discretionary" Safe Harbor Non-Elective could be contributed to HCE's, the ASC Adoption Agreement required a special check off that was missed for the 12/31/2022 Plan Year. Is a retroactive Amendment permitted to add HCE's as eligible for the 2022 Safe Harbor contribution?
-
Others employees with at least 800 hours of service entered on 07/01/2022. The Amendment applied to all employees going forward, effective as of 07/01/2022. with at least 800 hours of service in a 12 consecutive month period.
-
Calendar Year Plan Effective 07/01/2022, the hours requirement for eligibility was changed from 1,000 hours to 800 hours in a 12 consecutive month period. Employee was credited with more than 800 hours in the 2021 Plan Year, but is under 800 hours for the 2022 Plan Year. I would think she is not eligible - but software says differently.
-
Who is responsible for the RMD?
msmith replied to rblum50's topic in Distributions and Loans, Other than QDROs
In my experience, most Recordkept platforms will process the RMD, with Plan Sponsor consent only, if the participant is unresponsive. -
If this is an issue of "true" severance compensation, such as: we are closing down, everyone gets $5,000.00 or some amount, it is not 415 compensation and not included for Plan contribution purposes.
-
Neither do we. Also, it might not be corrected, with LOI, by the time the filing is due.
-
They are very helpful. However, I find their website to be rather cumbersome.
-
Agree with David and we also refer to our Service Agreement.
-
Termination For Embezzling Money + Profit Sharing
msmith replied to metsfan026's topic in 401(k) Plans
This happened to me (twice - same plan). The resolution was similar to Bird's. -
Vesting error by Plan administrator - they want money returned
msmith replied to MJR's topic in Retirement Plans in General
You say that you "retired." If you were at the Plan's Normal Retirement age, you may be fully vested. Check with your prior Employer. -
Thank you Nate and Bill. As a matter of our practice, we are restating for CYCLE 3, with the interim CARES and SECURE Act amendments for terminating plans. However, some at our practice believe that the restatement and amendments must be adopted before the date of termination, referring to IRS Announcement 94-101.
-
Company is acquired and they terminated their 401(k) Plan. The termination Resolution indicates that the Plan Termination Date was 12/30/2021. Mus the CYCLE 3 Restatement, with SECURE and CARES Acts Amendment be adopted before the Plan Termination Date? Different rules for a Stock sale or an Asset sale? Thank you.
-
Before the website changed, we were able to download the "filed" 5500 right away. Now, it has been 2 hours and it is still not there. Has anyone else experienced this?
