Jump to content

david rigby

Mods
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,141

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums (Message Boards)

Everything posted by david rigby

  1. david rigby
    T-H rules provide minimums (benefit, vesting). If the plan is more generous than the minimum, then it automatically satisfies T-H. Don't worry, be happy. BTW, I think that all plans must include T-H language even if all other plan provisions provide something better. (am I remembering that correctly?)
  2. david rigby
    Likely, this question has been answered (in the negative) sometime in the past when another EE changed positions. QDROphile is correct.
  3. david rigby
    You've probably heard me say it before: there is no insurable interest.
  4. david rigby
    This attachment is from a discussion draft dated 10/26/15. Apparently, the ability to count PBGC premiums as "general revenue" is so attractive to Congress that they will continue to abuse sponsors of DB plans. Proposed Budget 10.26.15.pdf
  5. david rigby
    Have you asked your actuary this question? By the way, what is "AMT15"?
  6. david rigby
    Why? could be lots of reasons. My hunch: it's a way to avoid most audits, by requiring the submission of information that would be requested in any audit.
  7. david rigby
    Only partially snarky: so what?
  8. david rigby
    BTW, the reference to "...100% vested in 3 years..." implies a cash balance design. Is that correct? Any other participants? Is the sponsor trying to postpone the RMD as long as possible?
  9. david rigby
    Pardon my ignorance: if they did not execute participation agreements for the "new companies", how is there a multiple-employer plan?
  10. david rigby
    In this context, does "advisor" mean someone involved in the asset investments? someone who gets a higher compensation/commission/etc. when the plan assets are larger?
  11. david rigby
    Think "intranet".
  12. david rigby
    https://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/IRS-Announces-2016-Pension-Plan-Limitations;-401(k)-Contribution-Limit-Remains-Unchanged-at-$18,000-for-2016
  13. david rigby
    Never cheat! BTW, what does the plan's attorney say?
  14. david rigby
    Any precedent? BTW, if you are not the actuary, the plan's actuary should be involved in this discussion.
  15. david rigby
    AndyH, are you suggesting we should be wary of attorneys from Mass?
  16. david rigby
    News release last year was dated 10/23/14.
  17. david rigby

    80-120 Rule

    david rigby replied to coleboy's topic in Form 5500

    The point of the 80-120 rule (see link above), is they may file whatever form they filed last year.
  18. david rigby
    You might have issues other than taxation, such as EE contributions toward medical coverage, LTD coverage, etc.
  19. david rigby
    Nope. See PBGC Blue Books. Q&As 2000-16 and 2007-05. http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/other-guidance/blue-books.html
  20. david rigby

    80-120 Rule

    david rigby replied to coleboy's topic in Form 5500

    See page 8 of the 2014 instructions. http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/2014-5500inst.pdf
  21. david rigby

    Church Plan

    david rigby replied to nancy's topic in Form 5500

    I don't think so. You may wish to review regulation 1.410(d)-1
  22. david rigby
    The plan might define the death benefit in a way that includes the 415 limit.
  23. david rigby
    Maybe none? In general, the plan pays to those eligible who make a claim. As long as you aren't hiding, I suggest the plan does not have an obligation to seek out a potential beneficiary, especially when such potential beneficiary is not obvious.
  24. david rigby
    Is the PS contribution discretionary? If the ER, in its discretion, decides to make a zero PS contribution, is that a freeze? Put another way, what is the intent of the original question?
  25. david rigby
    It may be prudent to inquire about the source of this "life insurance" payment.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use

  I accept