A profit sharing plan uses a 6-year graded schedule for it's employer allocations. The plan has never been top-heavy, but in a couple of years it will very likely become top-heavy.
The adoption agreement has a slot for electing a vesting schedule for top-heavy purposes. That section states for any year the plan is top-heavy, the top-heavy vesting schedule applies to the extent that it is more favorable than the plan's regular vesting schedule.
For some reason, the top-heavy vesting schedule is a 5-year graded (0,20,40,60,80,100) - one year quicker than the 6-year schedule. The employer would like the 6-year schedule to be applied when the plan becomes top-heavy.
The document then goes on to say that the top-heavy vesting schedule applies to all benefits within the meaning of 411(a)(7) except those already subject to a schedule that vests at least as rapidly as the schedule above. And only for participants with an hour of service after the plan becomes top-heavy.
The plan document spells out some rules for amending the plan's vesting schedule. Since the plan is not top-heavy yet, do those rules for amending the schedule apply to the top-heavy vesting schedule?
If they do apply, the plan states employees with 3 years vesting "may elect to have the nonforfeitable percentage computed under the Plan without regard to such amendment." With the plan currently not top-heavy, that election does nothing - they are still on the 6-year schedule. What choice are they making, for example, between schedule A or B: what would be vesting schedule A vs. what is vesting schedule B that they get to elect from?