Guest benefitsanalyst Posted November 8, 2002 Posted November 8, 2002 Must an employee's deferrals to a 401k plan cease when his compensation for the year has reached $200,000? We have an employee who makes well over $200,000 that just started to make contributions last month. However, his deductions were recently cut off because his comp for the year reached $200,000.
david rigby Posted November 8, 2002 Posted November 8, 2002 Several prior discussions on this topic. Try: http://www.benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=12346 http://www.benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=12107 I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Brian Gallagher Posted November 21, 2002 Posted November 21, 2002 thanks pax. exactly what i was looking for. Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
MWeddell Posted November 21, 2002 Posted November 21, 2002 Also take a look at the March 1999 Enrolled Actuaries Meeting gray book, Q&A 30, for some unofficial IRS guidance on this issue.
david rigby Posted November 21, 2002 Posted November 21, 2002 I'm not certain of the copyright issues here. For what is worth, the following is copyrighted by the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting. From the 1999 Gray Book: QUESTION #30 Other DC Issues: Application of Maximum Compensation Limit In a 401(k) plan, does IRC Section 401(a) (17) preclude the following? A. Employee A earns $300,000 annually. He enrolls in 401(k) calendar year plan in August, after earning $175,000. He defers $10,000 for the balance of the year. B. Employee A earns $300,000 annually. He participates in a calendar year 401(k) plan making monthly deferrals of a flat dollar amount of 1/12 of $10,000 in 1998, even though his pay exceeded $160,000 before he was done making elective deferrals. C. Same as B, but deferrals are a percentage of pay (3.33333%). RESPONSE All of the above are acceptable, assuming the plan is not drafted in such a way as to prevent it. In situation C, for example, a plan provision permitting deferrals expressed as a percentage of compensation but not permitting deferrals expressed as a dollar amount could not accommodate deferrals on pay in excess of $160,000. Where the plan permits deferrals expressed as a dollar amount specified in the employee's salary reduction agreement, the reference to a percentage in the individual agreement is irrelevant. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.