Guest KateSmithVA Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Husband and wife owners of S-Corp failed to deposit their own deferrals from their final paycheck in 2007. The funds were withheld from their paychecks and reported on their W-2s, they simply neglected to send them to the investment. Since it is obviously well past the deposit deadline, what is the correction for this? Thank you. Kate Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERISAnut Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Husband and wife owners of S-Corp failed to deposit their own deferrals from their final paycheck in 2007. The funds were withheld from their paychecks and reported on their W-2s, they simply neglected to send them to the investment. Since it is obviously well past the deposit deadline, what is the correction for this?Thank you. Kate Smith Two options, both are debatable. 1) Issue a corrected W-2 Form and correct issue outside of the SIMPLE IRA; making it appear as if the deferrals were never withheld. 2) Make the deposits as soon as possible and explore correcting under the DOL procedure for late deposits. The 30 day rule for deposit is an IRS rule (which was violated) and the ASAP rule is a DOL rule (that was violated as well). I would choose an option and move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KateSmithVA Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Thank you for your reply. When I look at EPCRS, it states that a correction for a SIMPLE IRA is expected to be similar to a correction for a qualified plan. Couldn't they make the contribution plus lost earnings from January 31, 2008? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERISAnut Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Yes, but use the date 'as soon as administratively feasible' instead of Janaury 30th. I would venture to argue that since they are the owner's of the company, no lost earnings would be allocable. However, a literal interpretation of the rules would not support this, but an understanding of who the DOL is trying to protect would. The DOL typically does not view owner's of the company as employees. However, the entitity is incorporated which may change that view. Different companies may fall on different sides of the argument. However, an attempt (in good-faith) to provide full correct of the error will often suffice (especially when considering the dollar difference between the two approaches is miniscule). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KateSmithVA Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Again, thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now