MBCarey Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Can someone tell me if the son of an owner is hired in July and will not be eligible for the plan until he has a year of service. Is he still considered HC for 2008?
ERISAnut Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Of course he is HCE. He's just not eligible due to age/service requirements; but still an HCE. Hope this helps.
MBCarey Posted September 11, 2008 Author Posted September 11, 2008 Sorry to be so dense. I would not count him in the testing until he is eligible, correct? I think I've been at this tooo long. Thanks
ERISAnut Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 Sorry to be so dense. I would not count him in the testing until he is eligible, correct? I think I've been at this tooo long.Thanks You are correct. He will be excluded from all tests because he as failed initial eligibility (age/service).
Jim Chad Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 I would add "unless you are testing excludables seperately.
ERISAnut Posted September 11, 2008 Posted September 11, 2008 I see what you are saying, but you must first meet eligibility under the terms of the plan to be includable in any test. If the plan prescribes a 21 & 1 provision, then no one who is less than 21 or who worked less than 1 year of service will be in any test performed by the plan (because the failed initial eligibility). That doesn't prevent them from being HCE, they are just an HCE who failed initial eligibility; and are therefore excluded from all tests. If the plan, however, had immediate eligiblity then you would be allowed to test separately between the early entrants and the regular 21 & 1 employees. Heck, you may also test the 'early entrant HCE' in the group with the regular 21 & 1 employees.
Guest TooMuchFreeTime Posted October 2, 2008 Posted October 2, 2008 Am I missing something? If he was hired in 2008, he wouldn't have any 2007 compensation. Absent that, isn't it impossible for him to be an HCE? Or is there some sort of attribution rules I'm missing involving the owner/father?
ERISAnut Posted October 2, 2008 Posted October 2, 2008 Am I missing something? If he was hired in 2008, he wouldn't have any 2007 compensation. Absent that, isn't it impossible for him to be an HCE?Or is there some sort of attribution rules I'm missing involving the owner/father? Section 318 of the IRC. You own what your parents own for HCE purposes.
BG5150 Posted October 3, 2008 Posted October 3, 2008 I would add "unless you are testing excludables seperately. From what I understand, he's not even eligible yet, so he isn't even excludable. He simply isn't in the plan. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now