BG5150 Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 I know a hardship should only be taken after all distributions and loans available to a person are taken. However, I've read that a loan doesn't have to be taken if it creates additional hardship. Where is that stated in the regs or guidance? And secondly, what if a loan wouldn't cause add'l hardship, but one is already taken, yet more is available. For example, a person took a $5,000 loan last year for 5 years. Now she wants a hardship. However, since the loan was taken, an additional $4,000 has been added to her account. Would she have to refinance the existing loan for an additional $2,000 before a hardship could be taken? Or does the existence of the first loan satisfy the provision that all distribs & loans must be taken before a hardship can be done? QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Belgarath Posted November 26, 2008 Posted November 26, 2008 As to the first question, see 1.401(k)-1(d)(3)(iv)(D). As to the second, for a quick off the cuff response without really thinking much about it, I'd say an additional loan would be required.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now