Guest Ohio City Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 Must an employer use the 190/month equivalnce set forth in 29 CFR 2530.200b-3(e)(1)(iv) for purposes of determining hours of service or can the employer adopt a different equivalnce if it is reasonable and accurate (such as 173 hours for each month of service)?
Guest Sieve Posted February 23, 2009 Posted February 23, 2009 As far as I know, reasonable and accurate is not an issue when you are not counting hours & not using elapsed time. The equivalencies are the equivalencies, and the only exception is for a "shift" equivalency (DOL Reg. Section 2530.200b-3(e)(2)). Otherwise, when using an equivalency other than an "hours worked" y/s equivalency (DOL Reg. Section 2530.200b-3(d)), you must use one of the enumerated h/s equivalencies (daily, weekly, semi-monthly, or monthly).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now