K-t-F Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 If none of the NHC employees defer does that mean that none of the HC employees can defer? Are they up the creak? 2 x 0% is 0% Background... Small plan of just HCE participants (no other employees at all). Times are tight.. may only make deferral contribution for 2009. One new employee (bookkeeper) who will be eligible. What is she doesnt defer? Suggested options? Doing 2009 planning. Its not easy being green
jkdoll2 Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 If none of the NHC employees defer does that mean that none of the HC employees can defer? Are they up the creak? 2 x 0% is 0% Background... Small plan of just HCE participants (no other employees at all). Times are tight.. may only make deferral contribution for 2009. One new employee (bookkeeper) who will be eligible. What is she doesnt defer? Suggested options? Doing 2009 planning. I would suggest a safe harbor match - that way it doesnt matter if the NHCE's defer or not - testing would still pass, otherwise the HCE's can not defer over 2% of NHCE's and that would be 0.
BG5150 Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 Is it too late to do SH for 2009 if the deferral feature has been implemented, I think. When will the bookkeeper be eligible? In 2009? Does the plan allow for a QNEC? If so, the ER could make a QNEC enough to satisfy the ADP test. And as for the 2% "limit" mentioned: it is the LESSER of NHCE average PLUS 2% or TIMES 2%. Therefore, it would be zero (0.00 X 2% is always less than x% + 2%) ASIDE: Someone once put up a rhyme of when you use the 2+, 2x and 1.25x. It turns out you use the 2x when the NHCE % is under 2, you use 2+ when it's between 2 and 8 and 1.25x when it's over 8. )Can anyone find a link to the rhyme? I can find it using search) QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Kevin C Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 Does the plan use current year or prior year testing?
Tom Poje Posted April 13, 2009 Posted April 13, 2009 if the HCE is age 50 or older, then you still get the catch-up, so something could be deferred. $5,500 is better than nothing. no matter which route you choose, be careful if top heavy rules apply.
Laura Harrington Posted April 13, 2009 Posted April 13, 2009 Are all of the HCEs owners? Or are some HCEs due to compensation only? If you have some HCEs due to compensation only, using the top-paid group definition of HCEs might help. Laura
Guest fender5150 Posted April 15, 2009 Posted April 15, 2009 I ran the test on this tool just for "fun": http://www.grubercompany.com/pages/hcelimitcalc.asp It definately comes to 0. That's been pretty clearly established though. But the catch up contribution is still an option. Kevin C asked about prior year testing. Perhaps that's another option.
BG5150 Posted April 15, 2009 Posted April 15, 2009 Is an automatic enrollment feature availble to the plan? QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now