Guest SLynch Posted April 20, 1999 Posted April 20, 1999 Owners receive a W-2 as well as a K-1'. Can 401(k) deferrals be based on total compensation from both sources?
Guest GG Posted May 3, 1999 Posted May 3, 1999 How can you say "no" without knowing the terms of the Plan Document? I suggest you check the definition of "Compensation" in the Plan Document, before you limit deferrals, or perhaps run your 401 (k) discrimination test on the wrong definition of comp. Is this an "S" Corp?
Guest Gary Tencer Posted May 6, 1999 Posted May 6, 1999 I assumed that if the owner received a Form W-2 and a Schedule K-1 that the entity has to be an S-Corp. Everybody should know that S-Corp Sch K-1 income is not eligible for a qualified plan. However, Sch K-1 self-employment income from a partnership is compensation, but the owner would not receive a W-2. ------------------
Guest Tracy Posted May 13, 1999 Posted May 13, 1999 . [This message has been edited by Tracy (edited 05-13-99).]
Guest VFernandez Posted May 19, 1999 Posted May 19, 1999 Good logical thinking Gary! Compensation and deferral limitations are defined by the IRS, they are not defined by the plan document. However, plan documents only apply to employees as defined under the plan itself...self-employment without a W-2 is unlikely to be chosen by an employer as an option for plan participation, since most 401(k) plans are offered as an employee retention benefit.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.