Guest Laura Millwood Posted July 10, 1999 Posted July 10, 1999 Does the rule that the IRS can deem your plan terminated if you fail to make a contribution in 3 out of the last 5 years apply to 401(k) plans? We have a client whose plan has not had any type of contribution (deferral or employer) in the last 4-5 years. Should the plan be deemed terminated and assets disbursed?
Guest ESOPwizard Posted July 11, 1999 Posted July 11, 1999 Without researching the issue, I believe that the IRS does not regard the plan as being terminated but might take the position that there has been a suspension of contributions, which would trigger vesting retroactive to when the contributions were suspended. Therefore, you have a vesting issue, which would be meanignless if the only contributions to the plan were 401(k) contributions. If the plan has participants who are not 100%, the company should consider making contributions or vesting the participants. Because I don't have all of the facts, I'm not making any specific recommendation.
KJohnson Posted July 13, 1999 Posted July 13, 1999 If you decide to formally terminate and distribute assets, watch out for successor plan issues. To distribute assets from a termnated 401(k), the employer cannot currently have another DC Plan or establish one in the twelve months after assets are distrbuted from the 401(k).
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.