Jump to content

Backdating of 401k enrollment?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello. I am new to a small group plan, working in the HR Department. Today I had an employee come to me who technically was eligible for our 401k plan back on October 1. He did not enroll at that time, but now with only 1 month left in the year, decided for tax purposes that he wants to enroll and make a lump sum deduction from his pay for his missed deductions from this quarter. I didn't think that this was possible and that he was just SOL until 1/1/2010. Has anyone ever experienced this before? Any chance anyone can point me to IRS documents to support my ability to tell him one way or another?

Thanks in advance

Eric

Posted

It's not an IRS document you need to reference, it's the plan document. It's very possible that he can enroll at anytime after his eligibility (10/1). What you need to look for is the entry dates.

It's not out of the ordinary for someone to miss their initial enrollment and then come it at a later time and enroll. Obviously he can't go back and deduct from prior payrolls, but he is probably entitled to defer 100% of the remaining 2009 compensation (up to limits).

R. Alexander

Posted

The ability to defer 100% of compensation also is a plan document issue.

Posted

Never participate in backdating. Under certain circumstances, actions can be considered to have a retroactive effective date, but when dating a signature it should always be the date that the document was in fact signed.

For example, many executives and companies that participated in the backdating of stock options have, in recent years, been caught and prosecuted.

John Simmons

johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com

Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.

Posted
The plan should have language about when participants can make changes in their deferral elections.

Does it HAVE to say it in the plan? Or can it be an administrative procedure?

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

It would depend on what the document says. Our EGTRRA documents allow an option to have it be "As designated under the Salary Reduction Agreement or other written procedures adopted by the Plan Administrator."

Posted
The plan should have language about when participants can make changes in their deferral elections.

Does it HAVE to say it in the plan? Or can it be an administrative procedure?

It is frequently and administrative procedure that does not appear in the document.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use