Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

401k plan has hardship withdrawals per the regulatory safe harbors.

EE presents a signed contract to purchase a house from her recently divorced ex-husband, which called for ex-husband to carry the contract for the entire purchase price. EE asked for a hardship withdrawal to make the "down payment" so she could buy the house. The request was rejected.

EE and ex-husband agree to tear up that contract and sign a new one for the same purchase price, but with a down payment and ex-husband just carrying the balance. EE submits the new contract, asking for a hardship withdrawal of the amount stated in the new contract for a down payment.

Is there a qualifying hardship?

Or, since she had an enforceable right under the first contract to acquire the house with no down payment, is the tearing up of that contract and signing of a new one a bootstrap effort that the plan administrator should reject?

John Simmons

johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com

Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.

Posted

As long as the second contract is valid, and I see no reason to believe it is not, I think the request is valid.

Ed Snyder

Posted
As long as the second contract is valid, and I see no reason to believe it is not, I think the request is valid.

I agree. I light of the recent airline case, I would be wary of plan administrators trying to use motive, rather than the black-letter documents in order to approve or disapprove a benefit.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use