Chippy Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 I'm working on a plan, 3% safe harbor is allocated on full year compensation. The plan is top heavy. So the safe harbor covers the top heavy minimum. They also would like to make an additional 3% profit sharing contribution. The p/s contribution is allocated on an integrated basis. Would the 3% p/s contribuiton be allocated as if the plan is top heavy, straight 3% to everyone eligible, or would it be allocated as if the plan is not top heavy on compensation plus excess compensation. THanks for any help to clear this up.
Laura Harrington Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 I'm working on a plan, 3% safe harbor is allocated on full year compensation. The plan is top heavy. So the safe harbor covers the top heavy minimum. They also would like to make an additional 3% profit sharing contribution. The p/s contribution is allocated on an integrated basis. Would the 3% p/s contribuiton be allocated as if the plan is top heavy, straight 3% to everyone eligible, or would it be allocated as if the plan is not top heavy on compensation plus excess compensation. THanks for any help to clear this up. You need to look to the plan document for the answer. You have to follow the allocation formula stated in the document. Laura
Below Ground Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 You may not count the 3% Safe Harbor Nonelective Contribution toward the "base allocation" of an integrated formula. It is a separate an distinct contribution allocation. Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
BG5150 Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 Is the Safe Harbor for first-year participants based on full-year compensation? And were any forms of compensation excluded from the TH determination? I believe the Top Heavy contribution is based on full-year, 415 compensation, which cannot exclude OT, bonus, commissions, etc. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Chippy Posted January 12, 2010 Author Posted January 12, 2010 For the Safe Harbor, the participants enter the plan on the first day of the quarter after they are hired. There is a one year wait for eligibility for the profit sharing. Comp is based on date of participation, however due to the different eligibility, all participants receiving safe harbor received 3% of their full year 415 comp. So, in a top heavy plan, everyone received 3% of their 415 comp in the safe harbor contribution. For the profit sharing contribution, the company wants to contribute another 3%. Since the plan is top heavy would the additional profit sharing contribution be allocated based on comp or comp plus excess? For someone earning the mas, would the basis be 245,000 or comp plus excess of 383,200? This is a non-standardized Relius adoption agreement.
BG5150 Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 Where do you get $383,200? Read the plan document for the allocation method for the profit sharing allocation. The Top Heavy contribution seems to be satisfied already, so you would be just allocating a regular 'ol profit sharing. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Chippy Posted January 12, 2010 Author Posted January 12, 2010 The 383,200 is 245,000 plus 138,200,( the comp over the social security wage base.) It's been a long year so far and it's only January 11! thanks for you help
Below Ground Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 I failed to fully read the OP. Sorry. BG5150 is correct. The SHN satisfies the THM, so then allocated the PS as if the Plan was not TH. Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
K2retire Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 You trying too hard. If you (temporarily) ignore the safe harbor, you would allocate your Integrated profit sharing contribution, and then check to be sure that the top heavy minimum was satisfied wouldn't you? The only difference here is that there is one more allocation from which the top heavy minimum could be satisfied.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now