Guest dott Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Participant has reached NRA (65). Participant is still an active employee and wishes to take an in-service withdrawal. Is this participant entitled to take a distribution even if the plan document does not have an in-service withdrawal provision?
david rigby Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Follow the plan document. BTW, the plan sponsor (or whoever has the appropriate authority) can amend the plan to add this provision. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
ACox Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 Participant has reached NRA (65). Participant is still an active employee and wishes to take an in-service withdrawal. Is this participant entitled to take a distribution even if the plan document does not have an in-service withdrawal provision? Look at the Retirement Distribution section of your document. Some documents have a provision in that section that states that a participant can take a distribution after reaching NRA and while still working.
Guest dott Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 Are you saying that the document would control here? The question was if NRA would allow the in-service withdrawal or if the document must have the provision to be allowed?
BG5150 Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 It's not automaic. The document must allow for the in-service withdrwal. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
david rigby Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 Are you saying that the document would control here? Yes, that's why a document must be in writing. If the sponsor wants to do something different, the document must first be amended. All documents have a procedure (or general outline) of how to amend, and who has authority. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now