BG5150 Posted November 2, 2010 Posted November 2, 2010 I have someone (non-owner) who needs to take an RMD for 2010. She is 74 and separated from service in September 2010. Her RMD is slated to be about $600. However, earlier in the year, she took a hardship distribution for $1,000. Does she still need to take the RMD? I would tend to think not because the hardship: 1. was paid to her (not rolled over) 2. wasn't eligible for rollover 3. taxes were withheld 4. it was for more than the RMD 5. tax form will still be code '7' Your thoughts are appreciated. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
masteff Posted November 2, 2010 Posted November 2, 2010 I agree. Reg 1.401(a)(9)-5 Q&A-9 Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now