Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have someone (non-owner) who needs to take an RMD for 2010. She is 74 and separated from service in September 2010. Her RMD is slated to be about $600.

However, earlier in the year, she took a hardship distribution for $1,000.

Does she still need to take the RMD?

I would tend to think not because the hardship:

1. was paid to her (not rolled over)

2. wasn't eligible for rollover

3. taxes were withheld

4. it was for more than the RMD

5. tax form will still be code '7'

Your thoughts are appreciated.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

I agree. Reg 1.401(a)(9)-5 Q&A-9

Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use