EGB Posted April 24, 2000 Posted April 24, 2000 Facts: Employee of Corp. A terminates employment with Corp. A and moves to Canada to become employee of Corp. B. Corp. B is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Corp. A. Employee participated in Corp. A's 401(k) plan and wants to take a distribution. Has employee separated from service from Corp. A (ie, is employee entitled to a distribution of his elective deferrals)? Note: Corp. B employees are not eligible to participate in Corp. A's plan. Corp. B has its own retirement plan established under Canadian law. Any citations would be greatly appreciated.
Guest mo Posted April 25, 2000 Posted April 25, 2000 I'm not sure what bearing, if any, the Canadian aspect of the new company has on the situation, but I believe that moving from one member of a controlled group to another, whether or not the new employer sponsors a plan, does not constitute termination of employment. BNA agrees based on the premise that they are considered the same employer under Section 401. PLR 8546123 and GCM 39384 are cited.
KJohnson Posted April 25, 2000 Posted April 25, 2000 I don't think there has been a termination of employment, much less a separation from service. "Employee" is defined using controlled group provisions of 1563(a). See 414(B) I do not believe that the statute or the regs exclude foreign corporations from this controlled group provision. (Controlled group rules in other non-plan contexts do exclude foreign corporations). Therefore, your employee is still employed by the deemed single employer under the controlled group provisions. I know there is a Rev. Rul. on this, but I don't have the cite handy.
EGB Posted April 25, 2000 Author Posted April 25, 2000 Thanks so much for your responses. My suspicion is confirmed. ------------------
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.