Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

a 2 participant plan has an insurance policy on one of the participants. the premiums have been paid on the policy by policy loans for the past few years, the participant is concerned that having a loan on a policy owned by the plan could be problematic. Seems as if he would have investigated this prior to issuing the loan. However, would there be any pitfalls after the fact?

Posted
a 2 participant plan has an insurance policy on one of the participants. the premiums have been paid on the policy by policy loans for the past few years, the participant is concerned that having a loan on a policy owned by the plan could be problematic. Seems as if he would have investigated this prior to issuing the loan. However, would there be any pitfalls after the fact?

It's only problematic in that it will likely not be able to keep the policy in force for long.

William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA
bill.presson@gmail.com
C 205.994.4070

 

Posted

I've heard it argued that a premium loan could trigger UBTI taxes. That might be what he's thinking about, but I don't think it's a problem.

Ed Snyder

Guest Stefanfeb
Posted

http://www.independentinsuranceadvice.info/

a 2 participant plan has an insurance policy on one of the participants. the premiums have been paid on the policy by policy loans for the past few years, the participant is concerned that having a loan on a policy owned by the plan could be problematic. Seems as if he would have investigated this prior to issuing the loan. However, would there be any pitfalls after the fact?

It's only problematic in that it will likely not be able to keep the policy in force for long.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use