drakecohen Posted November 29, 2012 Posted November 29, 2012 2011 ADP test looks like it's going to fail so the plan is amended before year-end (let's say 12/21/11) to impose a limit for 2011 on the deferrals of two named HCEs (let's say $15,000) so as to pass the ADP test and not have to make corrective distributions to other HCE's who are either not 50 or had already put in their $22,000 for 2011. 1) Any problems with this? 2) If not, any time constraint on when the amendment needs to be adopted?
drakecohen Posted December 7, 2012 Author Posted December 7, 2012 Thanks for the response. Any problem with limiting deferrals by individual?
rcline46 Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Nobody (govt) cares about HCEs, so of course you can limit by name.
BG5150 Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Our document provider wasn't too keen on doing that. By discriminating against one (or more HCE's) you were in turn discriminating in favor of the others who had no such restriction. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
rcline46 Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 I bet the document allows for it! And the regs permit ad hoc setting of limits. I would not be concerned.
MWeddell Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 A profit-sharing plan (including a 401(k) plan) has to have a definite allocation formula. Unless each HCE is specified as a separate class of employees, you may not be complying with the plan document if the limits vary by HCE.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now