Guest Achilles Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 Is there an issue here: Plan eligibility is age 21, 6 months service, qtr. entry. Compensation is defined as the plan year, not from date of entry. Plan document states a minimum deferral rate of 1% and max of 90%. Participant was hired January 1, 2013, and entered the plan July 1, 2013, started deferring at a rate of 3%. The question came up - this participant had 6 months worth of compensation prior to 7/1/2013, plan doc. states compensation is based on the plan year, and the plan has a minimum deferral rate of 1%. Does some type of contribution need to be made to the participant for the 1% minimum deferral rate based on the compensation from Jan. 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013?
BG5150 Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 The deferral rate is per pay period. It's not an overall figure for the year. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Guest Achilles Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 Thank you BG5150. But if there were 13 pay periods from 1/1 - 6/30, for these 13 pay periods some type of minimum 1% contribution would not be made? I agree and don't think there is an issue here, but others have raised a point that some type of error has occurred and needs corrected, but how to correct has not been determined.
BG5150 Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 Short answer: no. There are no retroactive deferrals for periods a person was not eligible. Again, the 1% minimum (and the 90% maximum) is on a per payroll basis, not an aggregate for the year. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
david rigby Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 Don't overthink it. If you are eligible to defer, you can defer. If you are not eligible to defer, you cannot defer. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now