Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Client has opted for Safe Harbor match in his plan... client also prefers that match be calculated on a per pay basis - each pay date a self contained calculation period... Is this possible?

Posted

I don't see why not.

Don't forget, the SHM must then be deposited no later than the end of the following quarter.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

It's also harder to check accuracy of the matching, unless you collect comp/deferral/match information for each payroll, or do the match calc for the client each payroll.

Posted

It's also harder to check accuracy of the matching, unless you collect comp/deferral/match information for each payroll, or do the match calc for the client each payroll.

Without a doubt. We put a caveat in our year end letters saying we can only vouch for the reasonableness, not the accuracy, of the match in such cases.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

The plan document must also say that is how the match is calculated. And, those provisions must be adopted before the beginning of the plan year and remain in effect for the entire plan year. The SH match allocation formula/method is a provision covered by 1.401(k)-3(e)(1).

Posted

We put a caveat in our year end letters saying we can only vouch for the reasonableness, not the accuracy, of the match in such cases

Same here!

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

Good, so, when you see a plan where the safe harbor match is about 3% of their deferral amount, not approximately 3% (or more) of their compensation, you would mention this as a potential issue for the plan sponsor to look into.

We've seen a couple of plans (much like the 3% example above) where the provider, big bundled provider, somehow disclaims all responsibility, and does not notify the sponsor of the reasonableness of the match amounts - because it's calculated per payroll and they disclaim all reponsibility. 3% of deferral is tiny compared to 3% of pay - come on!

Posted

The plan document must also say that is how the match is calculated. And, those provisions must be adopted before the beginning of the plan year and remain in effect for the entire plan year. The SH match allocation formula/method is a provision covered by 1.401(k)-3(e)(1).

Some documents allow for discrection as to when the match is calculated. Where it is calculated on a per-payroll basis, then the timely deposit rules prevail.

Posted

We've seen a couple of plans (much like the 3% example above) where the provider, big bundled provider, somehow disclaims all responsibility, and does not notify the sponsor of the reasonableness of the match amounts - because it's calculated per payroll and they disclaim all reponsibility. 3% of deferral is tiny compared to 3% of pay - come on!

The large providers we've seen have it in their contracts that they are not responsible for anything except processing deposits based on the client's instructions. The client is even responsible for reviewing and approving their work. At least one puts a certification line at the bottom of their ADP/ACP test for the client to certify that the testing is correct. From the obvious errors in some of the plans we've seen, there is no way anyone at the large provider looked at anything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use