Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am adding a loan feature to a plan. Currently, the distribution rules call for spousal consent in lieu of a QJSA.

I have seen plans that did not have consent for distributions have it in place for loans.

Could we have the reverse situation wherein SC is required for distributions but not for loans?

(The owner wants a loan and there is some marital strife, and it seems unlikely the wife will oblige with her Jane Hancock.)

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

My recollection is that if the plan is subject to the QJSA requirements, then spouse consent is required for loans. It was many years ago that the specific question was examined.

Posted

I am adding a loan feature to a plan. Currently, the distribution rules call for spousal consent in lieu of a QJSA.

I have seen plans that did not have consent for distributions have it in place for loans.

Could we have the reverse situation wherein SC is required for distributions but not for loans?

(The owner wants a loan and there is some marital strife, and it seems unlikely the wife will oblige with her Jane Hancock.)

My understanding was the same as QDROphile. The reason was what would stop the participant to take a loan with the intent to default. and thus deny benefits to the spouse?

Posted

I agree. Also found the answer in the EOB. Thanks.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use