Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When a parent dies, and is divorced, and the minor child is the beneficiary, is there something we should be requesting to "prove" that the surviving parent should receive the money on their behalf?

Suffice it to say that the deceased's family is "concerned" that perhaps the surving parent will not use the money in the best interests of the child. So we want to make sure we dot i's and cross t's.

I have heard the term Financial Guardian before - is that something we should be requesting even with respect to the parent?

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

It's often helpful, at least in analyzing the administrator's rights and responsibilities, to separate the concepts of guardianship and conservatorship. That a person is presumed, or court-ordered, as a minor's guardian of the person does not necessarily make that person a conservator or guardian of the minor's property. It's at least possible that a minor's surviving parent is a guardian of the minor's person but lacks authority concerning all or some of the minor's property.

On your questions about how much care a plan's administrator might use in satisfying itself that a proposed payee is a proper payee, what do the plan's documents say the administrator must do, and what do the plan's documents say the administrator may do?

And if the plan is ERISA-governed, is what the plan's administrator is thinking about doing (or omitting doing) within the standard of care set by ERISA section 404(a)(1)?

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use