austin3515 Posted October 15, 2014 Posted October 15, 2014 When a parent dies, and is divorced, and the minor child is the beneficiary, is there something we should be requesting to "prove" that the surviving parent should receive the money on their behalf? Suffice it to say that the deceased's family is "concerned" that perhaps the surving parent will not use the money in the best interests of the child. So we want to make sure we dot i's and cross t's. I have heard the term Financial Guardian before - is that something we should be requesting even with respect to the parent? Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
david rigby Posted October 15, 2014 Posted October 15, 2014 Does this help?http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?/topic/55523-beneficiary-is-minor-child/ I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
austin3515 Posted October 16, 2014 Author Posted October 16, 2014 Hilarious... Still a good question... Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Peter Gulia Posted October 16, 2014 Posted October 16, 2014 It's often helpful, at least in analyzing the administrator's rights and responsibilities, to separate the concepts of guardianship and conservatorship. That a person is presumed, or court-ordered, as a minor's guardian of the person does not necessarily make that person a conservator or guardian of the minor's property. It's at least possible that a minor's surviving parent is a guardian of the minor's person but lacks authority concerning all or some of the minor's property. On your questions about how much care a plan's administrator might use in satisfying itself that a proposed payee is a proper payee, what do the plan's documents say the administrator must do, and what do the plan's documents say the administrator may do? And if the plan is ERISA-governed, is what the plan's administrator is thinking about doing (or omitting doing) within the standard of care set by ERISA section 404(a)(1)? Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now