Rai401k Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 We have a client that has an adopting employer. The adopting employer will cease participation in the plan as of 12.31.2014. (Ownership will changed and no longer a controlled group). The current plan is a definite safe harbor plan (3%) however the adopting employer does not want to fund it for their employees for 2014. What are the repercussions for the plan if the adopting employer does not fund the safe harbor for their employees. Even though the employer/plan sponsor will be funding it for their employees, it still puts the plan in jeopardy. Has anyone had this situation? The adopting employer doesn't seem to care that the plan will be in jeopardy since they are going to be spinning off on to another plan starting 1/1/2015. Also because they have no association with the current employer going forward.
BG5150 Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 And qualification defects affect ALL adopters. Of which this company was one. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Lou S. Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 Oh and it will probably taint the plan they are spinning off to as well.
Rai401k Posted December 11, 2014 Author Posted December 11, 2014 Thank you, this is what we have been telling them but they don't seem to get it. I agree that the spin off plan is starting off on the wrong foot. Thanks!
BG5150 Posted December 11, 2014 Posted December 11, 2014 Does the sponsor have any legal recourse to force the adopting ER to pay the SH? QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now