Jerry Erisa Posted February 25, 2015 Posted February 25, 2015 a former employee's beneficiary? Has anyone seen this in practice? While we always wish to accommodate legitimate client wishes, this amendment request borders, if not leaps over, into non-reliance territory!? All of a sudden we could be (?) accepting de-facto "participants" by virtue that their inward rollover money could be (?) in the plan, regardless if they never worked for the Plan sponsor. Thank you for your thoughts and comments!
Bill Presson Posted February 25, 2015 Posted February 25, 2015 So someone works for the company, takes the qualified plan money out after terminating employment, dies and the beneficiary wants to roll the IRA into the plan? They aren't a participant, so I don't see any way you can accept the money. William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
david rigby Posted February 25, 2015 Posted February 25, 2015 Duplicate post. See this: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?/topic/56962-inward-rollovers-to-a-qualified-plan-by/ I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now