Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Client is considering amending to add a fixed match with no allocation conditions, and adding a last day requirement to receive their discretionary match. This would not be a safe harbor match. They have asked if they could amend or remove the fixed match mid-year in the event that they have cash flow issues.

Assuming they could pass benefits rights and features by making sure the HCEs don't front load their deferrals before such a change, would such an amendment be allowed?

Posted

Why not just have 2 different discretionary matches? One with a last day rule and one without.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

That is exactly what they want to do, but I didn't think it was possible. The document has a choice of yes or no for matching allocation conditions and I don't see an option to add a second match with different provisions, unless one is a safe harbor match.

Posted

but then of course, I'm sure the following rule probably applies

It's not my job to run the train,

The whistle I don't blow.

It's not my job to say how far

The train's supposed to go.

I'm not allowed to pull the brake,

Or even ring the bell.

But let the damn thing leave the track

And see who catches hell!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use