Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Company has two 50/50 owners, who are the only HCEs (comps for all others below limit).

Owners want to start a 401(k) as a tool to recruit a certain class of their employees. They are not concerned with participating themselves.

In order to cover just the certain class of employees and exclude all others the Owners are ok with excluding all HCEs so as to not be concerned with the coverage test, which would be right around the 70% ratio if the HCEs were covered.

Should there be any concerns with excluding all employees, including HCEs, with the exception of the targeted group of NHCs?

Thank you.

Posted

Why not just allow for deferrals for everyone and a New Comp, everyone in their own group, PS? Can offer PS to a select group and zero to all others, including themselves.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

If all HCEs are excluded you have no 410(b) worries if you limit participation to only certain employees. Still must satisfy 410(a). Still must not violate Federal and State laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age, race, sex, etc.

Posted

I'm not sure of the reasoning behind why they want to limit the plan to a select group, but apparently that is what they want to do.

Perhaps because they are not aware that they could do something like BG suggests?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use