Midyear amendment to SH plan... 30 days required?

[AlbanyConsultant]

A SH plan sponsor contacted me yesterday asking if she could amend her plan to allow for immediate entry effective immediately. The goal is to allow a new hire to be in the plan now so she can make a 2016 deferral allocation.

The safe harbor notice doesn't specifically mention the plan's deferral eligibility rules, instead referring the reader to see the SPD for details. It does mention the eligibility for the SH (which is statutory, though deferral eligibility is currently faster).

Obviously, there's no time to give a 30-day advance notice at this point, but I'm wondering if that's really a thing here; the wording in Section III.C. of IRS Notice 2016-16 is not clear to me:

C. Conditions for Mid-Year Changes to a Plan’s Required Safe Harbor Notice Content The notice and election opportunity conditions applicable to mid-year changes to a plan’s required safe harbor notice content (for purposes of applying the provisions in the first paragraph of section III.B of this notice) are described in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this section III.C. This notice does not require any additional notice or election opportunities for changes to information that is not required safe harbor notice content, even if that information is provided in a plan’s safe harbor notice. Also, this notice does not modify the rules governing information required to be included in a plan’s safe harbor notice.

...1. An updated safe harbor notice that describes the mid-year change and its effective date must be provided to each employee otherwise required to be provided a safe harbor notice under § 1.401(k)-3(d), 1.401(k)-3(k)(4), or 1.401(m)-3(e), as applicable, within a reasonable period before the effective date of the change. Whether this timing requirement is met is based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances, but this timing requirement is deemed to be satisfied if the updated safe harbor notice is provided at least 30 days (and not more than 90 days) before the effective date of the change. If it is not practicable for the updated safe harbor notice to be provided before the effective date of the change (for example, in the case of a mid-year change to increase matching contributions retroactively for the entire plan year, as described in section III.D.4 of this notice), the notice is treated as provided timely if it is provided as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days after the date the change is adopted. For purposes of this section III.C, if the required information about the mid-year change and its effective date was provided with the pre-plan year annual safe harbor notice, an updated safe harbor notice is not required.

...2. Each employee required to be provided an updated safe harbor notice under section III.C.1 of this notice must be given a reasonable opportunity (including a reasonable period after receipt of the updated notice) before the effective date of the mid-year change to change the employee’s cash or deferred election (and/or any aftertax employee contribution election). For this purpose, a 30-day election period is deemed to be a reasonable period to make or change a cash or deferred election. If it is not practicable for the election opportunity to be provided before the effective date of the change (for example, in the case of a mid-year change to increase matching contributions retroactively for the entire plan year, as described in section III.D.4 of this notice), an employee is treated as having a reasonable opportunity to make or change an election if the election opportunity begins as soon as practicable after the date the updated notice is provided to the employee, but not later than 30 days after the date the change is adopted.

It seems like it wants a 30-day notice in advance, but if you can't, no big deal. That can't be the correct interpretation, can it? Is the answer different if the goal is to also make the SH eligibilty immediate, too? Thanks.

[ETA Consulting LLC]

I think the notice can be concurrent with the plan amendment. The notice, itself, typically does not list the eligibility requirements for the plan. Instead, it says "If you are a participant in the plan". The language in the safe harbor notice would not change due to the amendment. Who actually receives it would change. So, amending the plan to add more employees into participant status would be okay. These employees would merely get the same notice previously given to other eligible employees.

Good Luck!