Carol V. Calhoun Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 § 1.401-1(b)(ii) permits a profit-sharing plan to have discretionary contributions, but requires that it have a "definite predetermined formula for allocating the contributions made to the plan among the participants." My question is whether a profit-sharing/401(k) plan can provide for board discretion to determine after the close of the plan year, but before a contribution is made, to which groups of participants the contribution will be allocated. Specifically, what we want to do is to specify in the plan that the board can decide to make discretionary contributions as follows: No contribution at all. Contribution to be allocated solely to the accounts of collectively bargained employees. Contribution to be allocated to the accounts of all employees (including collectively bargained). In any given year, the employer could elect to make contributions under 2 and 3. However, the employer would not be permitted to elect to make a contribution solely to the accounts of employees who are not collectively bargained. On the one hand, it could be argued that the formula is not predetermined, because the board's characterization of the contribution could result in its all being allocated to collectively bargained employees, or allocated to all employees. On the other hand, this seems no more objectionable than having two plans (one for collectively bargained, one for everyone else), and having discretionary contributions to each. For various reasons, we don't want to split the plan. Does anyone have any thoughts about whether this is a problem within a single plan? Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances.
Bill Presson Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 Ms Carol, you don't mention specifically how the plan would be allocated within those groups. However, if the plan was cross tested with everyone in their own group, can't you effectively accomplish this? William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA bill.presson@gmail.com C 205.994.4070
Mike Preston Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 Carol, This issue does track back to the regulation you cited. Some background may be helpful. First, there is the March 13, 1998 IRS Memorandum from Robert Padilla which includes: "... the plan must provide that the trustee be given written notification from the employer as to the amount of the contribution to be allocated to each group." You will also be able to find various IRS representatives making statements that the plan sponsor must provide written instructions to the plan administrator or trustee. Some of those statements will include a requirement for contemporaneous instructions. Some won't. I've never been able to find anything definitive as to the required timing. The closest I've come is language from the current LRM's which reads: "The employer will specify in written instructions to the plan administrator or trustee, by no later than the due date of the employer´s tax return for the year to which the employer´s contribution relates, the portion of such contribution to be allocated to each participant allocation group." If anybody has anything more authoritative I'd love to see it. But based on the above, the document language you describe should easily pass muster. Carol V. Calhoun 1
Carol V. Calhoun Posted January 10, 2017 Author Posted January 10, 2017 Thank you, Mike, that was exactly what I was looking for! Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now