Doghouse Posted February 6, 2017 Posted February 6, 2017 Plan's QDRO procedures stipulate that once a QDRO has been certified, there is a 60 day period in which either party may appeal (although I'm not sure if there are limits on WHAT they can appeal). The question is whether the participant or the AP should have investment control of the AP's interest during this time, knowing that there is some chance that the participant could appeal the QDRO in some fashion and the amount payable to the AP could be reduced or eliminated. Thoughts?
Peter Gulia Posted February 7, 2017 Posted February 7, 2017 If the employer/administrator has made written QDRO procedures, it might want to revise that document to specify which person directs investment during the period you describe. Perhaps BenefitsLink mavens might weigh in on which provision is more likely to support efficient plan administration. Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
My 2 cents Posted February 7, 2017 Posted February 7, 2017 If the Order was properly issued by a court and contains acceptable provisions, while I am not a lawyer and do not practice in the QDRO area, is it not true that there can be NO provisions under the plan involving anyone appealing the Order under the plan? Once accepted as Qualified by the plan administrator, the only thing that could get in the way of its being carried out exactly as is would be another COURT order staying or overturning the QDRO. There can be no discretion on the part of the plan administrator. The plan administrator can be under no obligation to watch out for pending court orders involving a challenge to the original Order!!! Always check with your actuary first!
RatherBeGolfing Posted February 7, 2017 Posted February 7, 2017 Generally, I would expect the availability of an appeal in the section of the QDRO procedure that describes what the procedure for notifying the P and AP of a determination that the DRO is NOT a QDRO. Any appeal should be limited to whether or not the DRO is qualified. To change what is in the order they would need to go through the court. If the procedures are silent as to who has control over segregated assets during the appeals period, I would give control to the AP. The reason is simple, you have already determined that you have a QDRO.
Doghouse Posted February 7, 2017 Author Posted February 7, 2017 Thanks everyone - confirmed my opinion.
Ruth Posted September 10, 2017 Posted September 10, 2017 Before trying to have a QDRO removed from my pension I want to get some facts on the possibility of even having a court change the order. Reason for request, expenses for disabled adult daughter. Input? R
Mike Preston Posted September 10, 2017 Posted September 10, 2017 You need to talk to a lawyer in your jurisdiction.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now