Scuba 401 Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 does anyone think or know whether the fiduciary rule includes a duty to monitor IRA service providers that might take rollovers from plan participants? I am having a disagreement with a colleague. i say there is no duty to monitor IRA advisors who deal with participants.
Soundbc1 Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 As far as I can tell the responsibility is on the service providers to document they discussed/ determined it was in the best interest of the participant to roll to an IRA. The plan sponsor would not have the necessary information to make determinations if the IRA service provider was acting in the best interest of the participant. The participant would need to hand over personal/private information to the plan that the plan sponsor/trustee has no right to demand. K2retire 1
Carol V. Calhoun Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 I don't think the employer has such an obligation. An adviser that advises participants on whether to take a rollover has an obligation to make sure such advice is prudent. However, the employer has no continuing obligation once the money leaves the plan. QDROphile 1 Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances.
My 2 cents Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 The service providers would presumably just provide the necessary information and a form permitting the participant to elect to roll the money over to an IRA. This would not represent a recommendation to roll the money over, and (one presumes) they would not be recommending a specific IRA in any event. Those who do make such recommendations are the people who should perhaps be worrying whether that makes them fiduciaries. Isn't the idea to make it so that the people suggesting investments are not being self-serving in doing so? The employer may have some responsibility in selecting a default IRA provider but otherwise one presumes that the wise employer will not otherwise be trying to push people to cash out of the plan (unless mandated by the terms of the plan) or where to put the money. hr for me 1 Always check with your actuary first!
Scuba 401 Posted June 9, 2017 Author Posted June 9, 2017 ok so now another question - i have been receiving negative consent documents from so providers concerning the sophisticated fiduciary exception. are there any documents that need to go out to clients during the transition period if you have always been a fiduciary to the plan and accepted fiduciary status in your service agreement and aren't changing anything in connection with the rule?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now