Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't understand this letter so I hope someone can tell me what I am missing. The new rules regarding amendmending safe harbors expressly allow you to amend for ANYTHING except the 4 expressly prohibited amendments.  Why are they asking the IRS to approve certain other amendments when there is nothing prohibiting those amendments?

 

http://www.asppa.org/Portals/2/PDFs/GAC/Comment Letter/final170606_Safe_Harbor_Mid_Year_CL.pdf

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

The devil is in the details.  At least one of the points in the letter was discussed at the ASPPA Annual IRS Q&A last year where the ASPPA panel felt the change did not fall under the 4 prohibited amendments and the IRS disagreed.  Asking for clarity and / or different wording is important.  

As for controversy, I think they have all they need with the Fiduciary rule and MEPs :shades:

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use