austin3515 Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 I don't understand this letter so I hope someone can tell me what I am missing. The new rules regarding amendmending safe harbors expressly allow you to amend for ANYTHING except the 4 expressly prohibited amendments. Why are they asking the IRS to approve certain other amendments when there is nothing prohibiting those amendments? http://www.asppa.org/Portals/2/PDFs/GAC/Comment Letter/final170606_Safe_Harbor_Mid_Year_CL.pdf Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Kevin C Posted June 9, 2017 Posted June 9, 2017 You are not missing anything. I agree with one of my co-workers who pointed out that controversy fills conference seats. Bird and austin3515 2
RatherBeGolfing Posted June 10, 2017 Posted June 10, 2017 The devil is in the details. At least one of the points in the letter was discussed at the ASPPA Annual IRS Q&A last year where the ASPPA panel felt the change did not fall under the 4 prohibited amendments and the IRS disagreed. Asking for clarity and / or different wording is important. As for controversy, I think they have all they need with the Fiduciary rule and MEPs
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now