coleboy Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 Hi, A participant is deferring 6% of pay and receiving the 4% safe harbor match. His match suddenly dropped down to 2% then to 0%. Upon questioning the payroll rep, I was told that it was because the participant reached the annual safe harbor compensation limit. So his match was capped at $8250.00 even though he had not reached the $275,000.00 limit yet. I have never heard of this. Is this correct? Thank you!
Tom Poje Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 my first question would be why the highlighted indicates 3%. That sounds like a 3% nonelective not a 4% match
coleboy Posted October 30, 2018 Author Posted October 30, 2018 Exactly! I was told it goes back to the "old" safe harbor limit of 3%. I said that is for the non-elective safe harbor not the match. Apparently Kronos has this set in its system. Am I missing something here?
NJ Mike Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 For those of you old enough to remember the TV show "Get Smart" it sounds like something Maxwell Smart would say "Fell for the old safe harbor limit of 3% trick again". Good luck in trying to straighten them out. Mike Luke Bailey 1
Tom Poje Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 send the guy to the board and have him write 100 times. works every time with Bart....oh wait...never mind DMcGovern 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now