mrslappywhite Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 Anyone have a cite or guidance on the feasibility or legality of "reclassifying" After-tax contributions as Roth deferrals? A client who claims they weren't aware that their document does not allow After-tax to be matched is balking at forfeiting match excesses and has asked if they can reclassify the After-tax as Roth so the participants can keep their match. I want to tell them NO but I can't find anything either in support of this or opposed to it.
Kevin C Posted February 22, 2019 Posted February 22, 2019 The definition of Roth deferrals is in 1.401(k)-1(f)(1). Amounts originally contributed as employee after-tax contributions do not meet this definition. Quote 1.401(k)-1(f) Special rules for designated Roth contributions—(1) In general. The term designated Roth contribution means an elective contribution under a qualified cash or deferred arrangement that, to the extent permitted under the plan, is— (i) Designated irrevocably by the employee at the time of the cash or deferred election as a designated Roth contribution that is being made in lieu of all or a portion of the pre-tax elective contributions the employee is otherwise eligible to make under the plan; (ii) Treated by the employer as not excludible from the employee's gross income (in accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this section); (iii) Maintained by the plan in a separate account (in accordance with paragraph (f)(3) of this section). It would be worth looking at 1.401(a)(4)-11(g) to see if a retroactive amendment to extend the match to after-tax contributions would be allowed. Depending on who made after-tax contributions, you might have a problem with the nondiscrimination requirements in -11(g)(3)(v).
mrslappywhite Posted February 22, 2019 Author Posted February 22, 2019 Thank you! This is perfect. And client agreed to forfeit the excess after I told them all the issues with doing a reclassification if it were allowed (rerunning ADP/ACP, taxation issues, etc.)
Luke Bailey Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 If plan allows after-tax as well as Roth, the SPD should state clearly that there is no advantage to doing after-tax until Roth bucket full, except for, in most plans, easier distribution rules for after-tax. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now