Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Plan will be a 401(k) with 90 day eligibility and quarterly entry dates.

They currently use a staffing company to fill new positions and then either hire them or not.    They are usually hired within 4-6 months.  No one makes the year required for leased employees.

The company wants to exclude credit for any service they had with the staffing company and count service once they are hired.

Is this allowable? 

How can it be worded in the document.

I had someone suggest excluding service with any other company not sponsoring the plan.

Thanks for any suggestions, just want to make sure I am not forgetting something.

Posted

I think this will give you your answer that you are looking for (from the current edition of Derrin's book).  Hours worked for the staffing company are required to be counted when someone becomes an actual hire.   

Q 5:44 How do the leased employee rules affect a “lease to own” situation?

Many employers will lease an employee for several months, or possibly longer, before offering them a permanent position with the company as an employee. This can simplify bookkeeping and reduce an employer’s unemployment insurance costs.

If a recipient hires its former worksite employee, the employee is credited with all hours of service earned while working under the leasing arrangement, whether or not he or she satisfied the substantially full-time requirement. [Code §414(n)(4); BL 11, BL 135, BL 136]

Example 5.44.1 Sandy’s Sweatshop leases Ellen from a temporary agency for three months, during which Ellen works 500 hours for Sandy. Sandy then hires Ellen directly. Ellen is already credited with 500 hours of service, even though Ellen was not technically a leased employee because she did not satisfy the substantially full-time requirement. Because the employment commencement date [Q 19:8] is the first day a worker is entitled to be credited with an hour of service, [DOL Reg. §2530.202-2(a)] Ellen’s first eligibility computation period begins when she started working for Sandy under the leasing arrangement.

Remember that the longer a “temporary” worker stays with a company, the more likely it is that a court may find the company is the true common law employer. [See Q 3:28] The importance of this issue can transcend the importance of the leased employee issues.

Example 5.44.2 Fancy Tools, Inc. has a good health plan for its employees. The plan document says all employees working over 30 hours per week participate. Fancy Tools needs a new shipping clerk. They contact Astaire Temps, who sends over Waldo as a temporary clerk. Waldo works there several months. Waldo is just like other Fancy Tools employees, except that Astaire gives him his paycheck. After four months there, Waldo contracts cancer and demands to have his medical costs covered under the plan, because he is Fancy Tools’ common-law employee. While that claim might have been rejected out of hand had he worked there only one week, it becomes more credible the longer he is there.

 

Lawrence C. Starr, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, CPC, ChFC, EA, ATA, QPFC
President
Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc.
46 Daggett Drive
West Springfield, MA 01089
413-736-2066
larrystarr@qpc-inc.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use