Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A client is considering beginning to contribute a match. However, they are considering different ways to fund it. They have asked about offering the option of receiving the match in cash or in privately held company stock.  The administrative complication is obvious.  But would this funding arrangement be permissible?

Posted

Yes, but as you know very well I'm sure, "can" does not mean "should".

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Posted
18 hours ago, Dan said:

A client is considering beginning to contribute a match. However, they are considering different ways to fund it. They have asked about offering the option of receiving the match in cash or in privately held company stock.  The administrative complication is obvious.  But would this funding arrangement be permissible?

Not in my practice!  Just the annual problem (and COST) of valuing the stock each year would be prohibitive in most situations.  And I think they have to be very careful with how the stock gets in the plan to avoid prohibited transaction  issues.  If the client insisted, they would be doing it with a different firm; we just don't need the headache that goes along with this.  You may feel differently and that is just fine with me.

Lawrence C. Starr, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, CPC, ChFC, EA, ATA, QPFC
President
Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc.
46 Daggett Drive
West Springfield, MA 01089
413-736-2066
larrystarr@qpc-inc.com

Posted
19 hours ago, Dan said:

They have asked about offering the option of receiving the match in cash or in privately held company stock. 

Do you mean the participants are going to be given a choice? That could make it worse from a securities law standpoint in terms of disclosures that would be required so that participants can make informed decision.

Note that you will find very few IRA custodians willing to take the rollover, if any, so sponsor will need to come up with the cash soon enough, and will have less of it because of the cost of the valuations as noted by Larry.

 

Luke Bailey

Senior Counsel

Clark Hill PLC

214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com

2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600

Frisco, TX 75034

Posted

 

On 1/23/2020 at 3:37 PM, Luke Bailey said:

Do you mean the participants are going to be given a choice? That could make it worse from a securities law standpoint in terms of disclosures that would be required so that participants can make informed decision.

Note that you will find very few IRA custodians willing to take the rollover, if any, so sponsor will need to come up with the cash soon enough, and will have less of it because of the cost of the valuations as noted by Larry.

 

Yes, these participants would have a choice to receive matching contributions in company stock or cash.  I am concerned about the disclosures as well, among a number is related issues. Always more to learn.

Thanks for your responses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use