Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A Plan provides for a Plan-Year-based discretionary match with a year-end true up.  There are no allocation conditions on the match.  The sponsor is currently not making a discretionary matching contribution.  Can the Plan be amended prospectively, but during the current plan year, to a per-payroll match with no true up?  Or does this violate the anti-cutback rule?

For example: it is now April 2020.  The sponsor is interested in beginning a per-payroll discretionary match in June 2020, with no year-end true up.  Can we amend the match from plan year to per payroll, effective June 1, 2020?  Or does this constitute a cutback because employees will not receive a match on deferrals made earlier in the year?

Thank you in advance for any insight!

Posted

Hayden Taylor, interesting question, and opinions may vary, but I would think that if the match is discretionary and no discretion has yet been exercised, such that if the plan were not amended the employer could get to the end of the year and say the match is $0 for this year, that amending it now to start a payroll-based match would not be an impermissible cutback, or even a cutback.

Luke Bailey

Senior Counsel

Clark Hill PLC

214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com

2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600

Frisco, TX 75034

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I faced this issue today and came to the opposite conclusion.  One can't change the allocation conditions because it is a protected benefit once participants have satisfied them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use