Becky Schwing Posted December 15, 2020 Posted December 15, 2020 Owner Company 1 Company 2 1 Husband 50% 100% 2 Wife 50% 0% Company 1 has a 401k plan - although plan allows form employer match all they do is allow for 401k deferrals - no match has been made to plan over the years. Husband recently acquired company 2 - only has 5 employees and he is only HCE. Wife has no part of company 2 Husband and Wife have one child under age 21 Am I correct that because they have a child under age 21 there is a controlled group situation here? If they did not have a child under 21 than there would not be a controlled group?
C. B. Zeller Posted December 15, 2020 Posted December 15, 2020 Yes, there is a controlled group due to the minor child. There would be a controlled group regardless, since they both have ownership in company 1 the spousal attribution exemption does not apply. Husband is deemed to own 100% of company 1. Luke Bailey and Mr Bagwell 2 Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
FORMER ESQ. Posted December 15, 2020 Posted December 15, 2020 Wife's 50% interest in Company 1 is attributed to Husband, so that Husband is deemed to own 100% of Company 1. The exception to spousal attribution would not apply here because Husband is a shareholder in Company 1. This is a classic brother-sister controlled group. The presence or absence of the minor child does not make a difference. Luke Bailey 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now